StupidGenius
Registered User
- Apr 1, 2013
- 1,153
- 1,378
Why does it matter? No one would propose realignment if NYR, Chicago, Detroit and the other financially successful US teams missed the playoffs.
Well, it's that time of year again. Spring is in the air, and playoffs are right around the corner. Unfortunately, there are no Canadian teams in the playoffs to route for and it will probably remain that way next season. That got me thinking a little bit...why not have a Canadian Division which guarantees that at least a couple of Canadian teams will be in the playoffs each year? I think it could be beneficial for Canadian hockey fans and the NHL. Thoughts?
No
That's all
You guarantee Canadian teams will be in the playoffs but you also limit how many and also eliminate the possibility of a Canadian final.
While the CDN-league proposal sounds nuts to some, we should remember a couple of things. There are 24 million hockey fans in the U.S. and 18.5 million in Canada. Going by fan numbers alone, we have enough to support at least 10 (maybe 12-14) separate teams. TV revenues are proportional: 40% of NHL TV revenue comes from Canada.
Bluntly, the loss of Canadian fan revenue from the U.S league would financially decimate 7-8 American franchises, they'd have way less to pay players and the salary caps. Florida teams, Nashville, Phoenix, Las Vegas, etc. So it's not so obvious that a US league would get all the best players.
Canadian fans are basically subsidizing the N.H.L and their teams haven't won a cup since Bettman came in (1993). When does it become rational just to call it quits, have two leagues and an end-of-year North American Championship game? Another 10, 20 years of statistically improbable futility?
Numbers: http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/why-cant-canada-win-the-stanley-cup/
While the CDN-league proposal sounds nuts to some, we should remember a couple of things. There are 24 million hockey fans in the U.S. and 18.5 million in Canada. Going by fan numbers alone, we have enough to support at least 10 (maybe 12-14) separate teams. TV revenues are proportional: 40% of NHL TV revenue comes from Canada.
Bluntly, the loss of Canadian fan revenue from the U.S league would financially decimate 7-8 American franchises, they'd have way less to pay players and the salary caps. Florida teams, Nashville, Phoenix, Las Vegas, etc. So it's not so obvious that a US league would get all the best players.
Canadian fans are basically subsidizing the N.H.L and their teams haven't won a cup since Bettman came in (1993). When does it become rational just to call it quits, have two leagues and an end-of-year North American Championship game? Another 10, 20 years of statistically improbable futility?
Numbers: http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/why-cant-canada-win-the-stanley-cup/
No, jet lag affects you more by going across time zones. A 3 hour flight our east is way harder on the body and mind than a 3 hour flight down south. Road trips would be hell.
NHL has become too revenue orientated and high brow priced for my liking. With as you say Canadian clubs financing this to no real benefit. We spend the most, to get the worst teams. Rinse, lather, repeat.
One of two things happens. If only Canadians can play in Canada then this league never goes. If you don't have to be born in the Country to be apart of it then we are going to be left with crappy teams in Canada.Exactly. What soccer has figured out is that people love trophies... the more "championships" you can give away and play for, the higher fan interest and revenue. NHL wants to grow but remains fixated on the Stanley Cup. But imagine:
1. Canadian league
2. U.S League
3. KHL (?)
4. Scandinavian league
With a 16-team Champions-league style thing in the early summer featuring at least two teams from each league. Yeah, some N.A. team might win it easily. Who cares? Would be epic. Sadly, probably never going to happen.
One of two things happens. If only Canadians can play in Canada then this league never goes. If you don't have to be born in the Country to be apart of it then we are going to be left with crappy teams in Canada.
What an interesting idea, it's really exciting to think about. I think you are exactly right that the NHL is too obsessed on the Stanley Cup. That made sense in 1965 or even 1980, but nowadays...?Exactly. What soccer has figured out is that people love trophies... the more "championships" you can give away and play for, the higher fan interest and revenue. NHL wants to grow but remains fixated on the Stanley Cup. But imagine:
1. Canadian league
2. U.S League
3. KHL (?)
4. Scandinavian league
1968 to 1991 (24 seasons):
Canadian Team vs. Canadian Team Finals = 2
Canadian Team vs. USA Team Finals = 15
US Team vs. US Team Finals = 7
1992 to 2016 (25 seasons):
Canadian Team vs. Canadian Team Finals = 0
Canadian Team vs. USA Team Finals = 6
US Team vs. US Team Finals = 18
So, not trending in a good direction from the Canadian franchise perspective.
Well, the Canadian team performance since 1993 has been extremely poor overall, and this year is an exclamation point on that. We have no playoff teams and 5 out of the bottom 6... I don't see how it could get much worse. Moreover, I don't think you're right: fan revenue between the two countries is nearly equal, we'd be able to pay players just as much up here as the U.S. could.
No way. The amount of travel involved would be insane.
Well, it's that time of year again. Spring is in the air, and playoffs are right around the corner. Unfortunately, there are no Canadian teams in the playoffs to route for and it will probably remain that way next season. That got me thinking a little bit...why not have a Canadian Division which guarantees that at least a couple of Canadian teams will be in the playoffs each year? I think it could be beneficial for Canadian hockey fans and the NHL. Thoughts?