To answer the overarching question, yes, if for the simple reason that although this team admittedly has been better in transition over the past month or so, despite employing 2 or 3 different systems at this point, through 125 games, this team has no concept of how to work the puck into the middle of the ice in the offensive zone (short of Terry trying to dangle through 3 guys trying to get it there); if the perimeter is Pride Rock, the slot may as well be the Elephant Graveyard. The basic premise of what we do is try to win puck battles (apparently not enough because all of our best players are not fit to retrieve pucks or are not physically developed enough to outmuscle the opposition over a full 60 minutes), send the puck around the perimeter from one point to the other point, and blast away hoping for a tip or the occasional rebound if anyone even works their way to the front of the goal. Net result: we're usually one-and-done in the offensive zone and what we run is completely antithetical to Cronin's entire ethos as a head coach.
There's nothing even remotely close to some of the basic principles I see watching any other team play: no weave concepts up high, no subtle picks to create space, very little interchanging up high between forwards and defensemen to cause confusion (our guys essentially function as a 4th-man rover with no forward committing to cover the point; and this goes double for the PP). We may not have the horses that the other teams have, but it is inexcusable with the pedigree we've got up front to generate as little offense as we do night in and night out.