Toggle sidebar

Should Bunting be put back into the lineup?

  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates

Should Bunting be put into the lineup?

  • Yes

  • No

Results are only viewable after voting.
Peace Frog said:
If Bunting was only suspended for one game, would people still be considering not putting him back into the lineup?
Click to expand...
If it was the 7-2 games, I think we would still say 'let's try another game without him'.

If it was a closer game, there would be reason to consider putting him back.

But after three consecutive wins it looks like a no-brainer to leave him out.

In each of the last two games there have been fewer penalties than in the previous one.
 
kb said:
They weren't outplayed 3/4 .

Where is this narrative coming from????
Click to expand...
They were outplayed in parts of all four games, but overall they were the better teams in 3/4.

Part of the narrative is from people who are fans or anti-fans of particular players, part is just trolling or listening to trolls, and part is from people who are protecting themselves from massive disappointment by getting their excuses in line early.
 
  • Like
Reactions: klmdg
Fogelhund said:
Bunting drew more penalties than any other player in the NHL this year. Odds are we get a PP, more so that a PK.

With Bunting on the ice, we scored 64% of the goals. He has one point less than Tavares 5v5 this year. He makes the team better, and has consistently done so.

He is a far superior hockey player than ZAR…. And he’ll be more of a distraction for Tampa than us…
Click to expand...
True, and maybe what I meant to say is, our PK needs to be more consistent. I don’t have the stats to look at, though.
 
Jamason said:
They were outplayed in parts of all four games, but overall they were the better teams in 3/4.

Part of the narrative is from people who are fans or anti-fans of particular players, part is just trolling or listening to trolls, and part is from people who are protecting themselves from massive disappointment by getting their excuses in line early.
Click to expand...

I’m legitimately curious which of games 1 and 3 you think the Leafs were the better team? They were clearly outplayed in both. Sure, in game 4 despite the comeback the Leafs were probably the better team by a bit, but that’s doesn’t apply to game 3.
 
They haven’t played well but winning so why upset the Apple cart? Making the call now eliminates a day and a half of speculation and distraction. I think sitting him is the call
 
Yep, I had a feeling he would be scratched... Imagine the scrutiny if Keefe put him back in, and they lose game 5.

And if you lose game 5, now you can put him back in and have no issues.
 
Let him play against Boston… the guys who just won 3 in a row, deserve to take TB out in a sweep.
 
  • Like
Reactions: klmdg
MK78 said:
Yep, I had a feeling he would be scratched... Imagine the scrutiny if Keefe put him back in, and they lose game 5.

And if you lose game 5, now you can put him back in and have no issues.
Click to expand...
Keefe with reactionary loser coaching methods.

Lead or GTFO.

He's a chicken because of his track record of leading teams to doom.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: Puckstuff and JadedLeaf
Canada4Gold said:
I’m legitimately curious which of games 1 and 3 you think the Leafs were the better team? They were clearly outplayed in both. Sure, in game 4 despite the comeback the Leafs were probably the better team by a bit, but that’s doesn’t apply to game 3.
Click to expand...
Apparently some of the fancy stats say we were the better team in game 1 (I don't believe it, and that's part of why I'm skeptical of people who rely on them too much.

Game 3 was very close, but I give the slight edge to the team that won.
 
Larcos_Unal said:
Fare thee well my Scarborough Prince

Click to expand...

Correct decision. Let him sit an extra game and really drive home that this isn't just "league out to get Bunting." Let him have that extra chance to really absorb the idea of just how much he frog'd it up and that he needs to earn his place back.

If the Leafs win game 5 I have no problem with starting Bunting in game 1 against Boston. But we've been to win #3 and gotten no further too many times to get cute right now. Go with the guys who won you 3 games to get win #4. you have 2 games to try something else if it doesn't work tomorrow.
 
  • Like
Reactions: klmdg
HamiltonNHL said:
Keefe with reactionary loser coaching methods.

Lead or GTFO.

He's a chicken because of his track record of leading teams to doom.
Click to expand...
Silly post. This is what leadership looks like. He knows more about Bunting's headspace than were capable of knowing. I think it's very possible that Bunting is stuck in a narrative of oh, the league is out to get me, and sending him right back out there in that headspace would be a TERRIBLE idea. The Leafs have a luxury with the 3-1 lead of not necessarily needing to be all hands on deck. use that opportunity while you've got it. Especially if you have ambitions beyond round 2.
 


I wish there was a Bunting GTFO option.


I voted No.

SImpelton said:
Correct decision. Let him sit an extra game and really drive home that this isn't just "league out to get Bunting." Let him have that extra chance to really absorb the idea of just how much he frog'd it up and that he needs to earn his place back.

If the Leafs win game 5 I have no problem with starting Bunting in game 1 against Boston. But we've been to win #3 and gotten no further too many times to get cute right now. Go with the guys who won you 3 games to get win #4. you have 2 games to try something else if it doesn't work tomorrow.
Click to expand...
That's fair.
 
Jamason said:
Apparently some of the fancy stats say we were the better team in game 1 (I don't believe it, and that's part of why I'm skeptical of people who rely on them too much.

Game 3 was very close, but I give the slight edge to the team that won.
Click to expand...

I was surprised to see how close game 1 was when I just looked, but Tampa still had a slight xGF edge both 5 on 5 and in all situations and our goaltending was much worse. Score effects is also a thing that made that game look close statistically than it probably was

Game 3 wasn’t even close. Tampa has twice as many xGF 5 on 5 and was better on the PP as well. Money Pucks’s “deserve to win o’meter” was 75% in Tampa’s favour as well.

Game 4 was almost dead even as well which surprised me. I thought Toronto was better in every period except the 1st but the 1st was so bad I guess it evened out.

So 2 even games and 1 dominant game for each team. We’re lucky to be up 3-1 for sure
 
Don’t change a winning lineup. If we never lose all the way to the finals, sorry bud.
 
  • Like
Reactions: klmdg
Reality check: the Leafs have been outshot in 2 of 4 games. The 2 games in Tampa Bay were not emphatic wins. Tampa Bay had a deserved lead of 4-1 after 2 periods of game 4. It's very nice how things have gone but the Leafs have not be blowing Tampa Bay away. Not accepting the team's 5th leading scoring forward back into the lineup would be utter madness.
 
QJo said:
If Matthews missed a win due to injury or suspension you wouldn't put him in?
Click to expand...
Matthews is a tier so far above that it’s not even a comparison. Don’t.
Hedman is hurt he comes back. Bogo is hurt, he stays.
 
  • Like
Reactions: klmdg
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Top Bottom