Maybe the NHLe rates should be adjusted if this many are putting up NHL 100pt projected rates.
Prospect Info: Sharks Prospect Info & Discussion thread XXI: "New, improved, and wayyyy to much info" Edition
- Thread starter The Nemesis
- Start date
Maybe the NHLe rates should be adjusted if this many are putting up NHL 100pt projected rates.
Haven't watched them much, but despite their size, just based on stat lines, we should sign Pohlkamp (who looked great already last summer) + Muldowney for AHL.
Rimashevsky got size, but not sure if he'd go from KHL to AHL.
I think that's openly acknowledged. CHL and KHL have taken a half-step back, while NCAA has taken a step ahead...and maybe the gap between those leagues and the AHL/NHL has also widened!
Out of curiosity, what are we seeing from Rimashevsky that signals he’s ready for AHL? Admittedly, I’m just going off his stat line, but is 15 points in 55 games as a 20 year old in the KHL impressive? I’m not being flippant, I have no sense of what that means about Rimashevsky.
Last edited:
He started playing regularly in the KHL as a 19 year old, that's what's impressive.
KHL used to be clear cut second best league after the NHL. There's more fluctuation now between teams, so there's been debate on whether this is still true.
Either way, if he did make the jump over he would do well in the AHL.
However for development, it might be fine to just keep him in the KHL longer. Someone closer to the KHL would know better what the growth opportunities at his team look like.
Just leave Rimashevsky in Russia, and if he's dominating the KHL in three/four years, then you bring him over. Long-shot prospects playing in the KHL don't come to the States to play three years in the AHL, and understandably so.
THN future watch arrived in my mailbox this morning.
Sharks prospect pool ranked 1st overall, I believe counting the value of Celebrini and Smith as U21 NHLers.
In the top 100 prospects (not counting guys in the NHL) were:
7) Dickinson
41) Musty
68) Mukhamadullin
72) Chernyshov
88) Bystedt
and the organizational top 10 is:
1) Dickinson
2) Musty
3) Mukhamadullin
4) Chernyshov
5) Bystedt
6) Halttunen
7) Graf
8) Cagnoni
9) Sahlin Wallenius
10) Lund
I couldn't find their criteria to understand why Askarov is excluded, though the best guess I can make is NHL GP (even though he's only got 16 games) possibly interacting with the fact that he's had multiple seasons with GP in the NHL
Sharks prospect pool ranked 1st overall, I believe counting the value of Celebrini and Smith as U21 NHLers.
In the top 100 prospects (not counting guys in the NHL) were:
7) Dickinson
41) Musty
68) Mukhamadullin
72) Chernyshov
88) Bystedt
and the organizational top 10 is:
1) Dickinson
2) Musty
3) Mukhamadullin
4) Chernyshov
5) Bystedt
6) Halttunen
7) Graf
8) Cagnoni
9) Sahlin Wallenius
10) Lund
I couldn't find their criteria to understand why Askarov is excluded, though the best guess I can make is NHL GP (even though he's only got 16 games) possibly interacting with the fact that he's had multiple seasons with GP in the NHL
