Prospect Info: Sharks Prospect Info & Discussion thread XXI: "New, improved, and wayyyy to much info" Edition

Touching on this...what should the fate be for Laubach, Muldowney, Rimashevsky, and Pohlkämp? I singled out those players since they're putting up numbers suggesting they are ready to move on...
Haven't watched them much, but despite their size, just based on stat lines, we should sign Pohlkamp (who looked great already last summer) + Muldowney for AHL.
Rimashevsky got size, but not sure if he'd go from KHL to AHL.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sandisfan
Touching on this...what should the fate be for Laubach, Muldowney, Rimashevsky, and Pohlkämp? I singled out those players since they're putting up numbers suggesting they are ready to move on...

Out of curiosity, what are we seeing from Rimashevsky that signals he’s ready for AHL? Admittedly, I’m just going off his stat line, but is 15 points in 55 games as a 20 year old in the KHL impressive? I’m not being flippant, I have no sense of what that means about Rimashevsky.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Sandisfan
Out of curiosity, what are we seeing from Rimashevsky that signals he’s ready for AHL? Admittedly, I’m just going off his stat line, but is 15 points in 55 games as a 20 year old in the KHL impressive? I’m not being flippant, I have no sense of what that means about Rimashevsky.
He started playing regularly in the KHL as a 19 year old, that's what's impressive.
KHL used to be clear cut second best league after the NHL. There's more fluctuation now between teams, so there's been debate on whether this is still true.

Either way, if he did make the jump over he would do well in the AHL.
However for development, it might be fine to just keep him in the KHL longer. Someone closer to the KHL would know better what the growth opportunities at his team look like.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sandisfan
THN future watch arrived in my mailbox this morning.

Sharks prospect pool ranked 1st overall, I believe counting the value of Celebrini and Smith as U21 NHLers.

In the top 100 prospects (not counting guys in the NHL) were:

7) Dickinson
41) Musty
68) Mukhamadullin
72) Chernyshov
88) Bystedt

and the organizational top 10 is:

1) Dickinson
2) Musty
3) Mukhamadullin
4) Chernyshov
5) Bystedt
6) Halttunen
7) Graf
8) Cagnoni
9) Sahlin Wallenius
10) Lund

I couldn't find their criteria to understand why Askarov is excluded, though the best guess I can make is NHL GP (even though he's only got 16 games) possibly interacting with the fact that he's had multiple seasons with GP in the NHL
 
  • Like
Reactions: NiWa and Sandisfan
THN future watch arrived in my mailbox this morning.

Sharks prospect pool ranked 1st overall, I believe counting the value of Celebrini and Smith as U21 NHLers.

In the top 100 prospects (not counting guys in the NHL) were:

7) Dickinson
41) Musty
68) Mukhamadullin
72) Chernyshov
88) Bystedt

and the organizational top 10 is:

1) Dickinson
2) Musty
3) Mukhamadullin
4) Chernyshov
5) Bystedt
6) Halttunen
7) Graf
8) Cagnoni
9) Sahlin Wallenius
10) Lund

I couldn't find their criteria to understand why Askarov is excluded, though the best guess I can make is NHL GP (even though he's only got 16 games) possibly interacting with the fact that he's had multiple seasons with GP in the NHL
I wonder how many games Chernyshov had with Saginaw before they put this together. It's going to be fun to see him shoot up some lists this summer.

Mukhamadullin is one of those guys who feels like he's just going to have been perennially underrated as a prospect, which is kind of funny because he has all the tools that you'd think people would salivate over. But I guess ever since the beginning--going back to him being sort of under-scouted in Russia--there have always been some complicating factors, so I can't say I hold it against all these prospect evaluators out there. But I've always thought it's going to be fun watching them look silly as he becomes a top-4 d-man, which I'm feeling better and better about lately.
 
I wonder how many games Chernyshov had with Saginaw before they put this together. It's going to be fun to see him shoot up some lists this summer.

Mukhamadullin is one of those guys who feels like he's just going to have been perennially underrated as a prospect, which is kind of funny because he has all the tools that you'd think people would salivate over. But I guess ever since the beginning--going back to him being sort of under-scouted in Russia--there have always been some complicating factors, so I can't say I hold it against all these prospect evaluators out there. But I've always thought it's going to be fun watching them look silly as he becomes a top-4 d-man, which I'm feeling better and better about lately.

The thing I’ve really liked about Muhk is he seems really coachable and sort of slowly and methodically improved all the things people tell him to improve. This season was a major setback but as I kept saying when people were saying he was busting, the injury was a major detriment to him. The fact that he’s recovered and continued his upward trajectory really speaks well of him as a prospect, I think he’s going to be very, very good and I’m excited to see him take more steps in the NHL.

I only wish he got to play on his natural side but he seems to be doing okay on the left. I think a Dickinson - Muhk pairing is going to be insane.
 

Ad

Ad