hohosaregood
Banned
- Sep 1, 2011
- 33,080
- 13,707
Prospect board getting a little disgruntled that SJ hasn't gotten their name called yet. I think everybody is a little surprised.
I’ll be curious to see what Pronman says about Suomela, because he and Praplan count according to his criteria. I’m surprised the Sharks are this high, but Merkley’s presence is clearly playing a large part. Then you have to wonder about Balcers who was the youngest forward besides True on the Cuda and he lead the team in goals and points. Maybe we’re so used to our prospects sucking that we’re undervaluing some guys. Except Nem, who claims he started every hype train.Prospect board getting a little disgruntled that SJ hasn't gotten their name called yet. I think everybody is a little surprised.
I’ll be curious to see what Pronman says about Suomela, because he and Praplan count according to his criteria. I’m surprised the Sharks are this high, but Merkley’s presence is clearly playing a large part. Then you have to wonder about Balcers who was the youngest forward besides True on the Cuda and he lead the team in goals and points. Maybe we’re so used to our prospects sucking that we’re undervaluing some guys. Except Nem, who claims he started every hype train.
Ferraro is gonna be a stud. I don't know how many people outside the Sharks fanbase realize he outscored 4th overall pick Cale Makar last year playing on the same team despite only being a month older.
I believe Makar had the slightly higher PPG but your point still stands, and it’s also important to consider that Ferraro was named team MVP.
I understand that there are many factors that go into rating a prospect, but when a 47th overall pick is named team MVP over a 4th overall pick who was drafted in the same year, you’ve got to think one of their stocks should either have a massive increase or a massive decrease. In the case of Ferraro/Makar, I think Ferraro should be the one who should see a massive increase in his stock.
People seem to highly value Pronman's opinion. What has he done to garner such trust? What perspicacious picks are in his history?
People seem to highly value Pronman's opinion. What has he done to garner such trust? What perspicacious picks are in his history?
Entire Sharks board-"We have the worst prospect pool in the league"
(ratings come out shortly after)
Entire Sharks board-"Man, we are STACKED!"
I believe Makar had the slightly higher PPG but your point still stands, and it’s also important to consider that Ferraro was named team MVP.
I understand that there are many factors that go into rating a prospect, but when a 47th overall pick is named team MVP over a 4th overall pick who was drafted in the same year, you’ve got to think one of their stocks should either have a massive increase or a massive decrease. In the case of Ferraro/Makar, I think Ferraro should be the one who should see a massive increase in his stock.
People seem to highly value Pronman's opinion. What has he done to garner such trust? What perspicacious picks are in his history?
Ferraro proved himself as a prospect but I don't think it doesn't really take away from Makar in any way. Makar was still the offense centerpiece there. Like I've mentioned, collegehockeynews does some individual player shot tracking and Makar leads the way by a lot.I believe Makar had the slightly higher PPG but your point still stands, and it’s also important to consider that Ferraro was named team MVP.
I understand that there are many factors that go into rating a prospect, but when a 47th overall pick is named team MVP over a 4th overall pick who was drafted in the same year, you’ve got to think one of their stocks should either have a massive increase or a massive decrease. In the case of Ferraro/Makar, I think Ferraro should be the one who should see a massive increase in his stock.
Ferraro proved himself as a prospect but I don't think it doesn't really take away from Makar in any way. Makar was still the offense centerpiece there. Like I've mentioned, collegehockeynews does some individual player shot tracking and Makar leads the way by a lot.
2017‑18 Massachusetts Statistics Advanced Metrics
Yea I think Leonard could be a big dark horse prospectSo what you are saying is screw Makar and Ferraro, get on the John Leonard hype train! I'm on board with that!
Ferraro proved himself as a prospect but I don't think it doesn't really take away from Makar in any way. Makar was still the offense centerpiece there. Like I've mentioned, collegehockeynews does some individual player shot tracking and Makar leads the way by a lot.
2017‑18 Massachusetts Statistics Advanced Metrics