Prospect Info: Sharks Prospect Info & Discussion Megathread XXI: "New, improved, and wayyyy too much info" Edition

[LadyStanley]

 

[OilersFanatics505]

Pedantic take but it’s 7 points. Not 8.

 

[Le Grand Quebecois]

Has anyone heard anything about Gannon Laroque? He seems to have just disappeared. Is it a re-injury?

 

[Juxtaposer]

Has anyone heard anything about Gannon Laroque? He seems to have just disappeared. Is it a re-injury?

Injured again. His skating is no good anymore and he's missed too much developmental time to become anything. Really, really feel for this poor kid.

 

[Original22]

Injured again. His skating is no good anymore and he's missed too much developmental time to become anything. Really, really feel for this poor kid.

Poor dude is Jeremy Roy 2.0

 

[CaptainShark]

Sharks are No.1 in Wheeler‘s prospect pool ranking. Mack and Mukh don’t count as prospects anymore, the fresh prince still does (haven’t looked into the criteria, but it has me confused)…

Edit: I looked it up and the cut off is „established NHL player“ which is 100% subjective

 

[Barrie22]

Sharks are No.1 in Wheeler‘s prospect pool ranking. Mack and Mukh don’t count as prospects anymore, the fresh prince still does (haven’t looked into the criteria, but it has me confused)…

Edit: I looked it up and the cut off is „established NHL player“ which is 100% subjective

Haha so the one that has played all but a handful of development day games is still a prospect but the one that over has 15 career nhl games in 2 seasons and has been an AHL pro for 4 years is not counted as a prospect. Yeah makes absolutely zero sense.

I am 100% more confident today of smiths potential then i am of even knowing if Mukh will be even an nhl player.

 

[CaptainShark]

Haha so the one that has played all but a handful of development day games is still a prospect but the one that over has 15 career nhl games in 2 seasons and has been an AHL pro for 4 years is not counted as a prospect. Yeah makes absolutely zero sense.

I am 100% more confident today of smiths potential then i am of even knowing if Mukh will be even an nhl player.

Mukh might have been cut off because of age. I lost interest

 

[coooldude]

Mukh might have been cut off because of age. I lost interest

He was.

He explained in the article why Smith was included (eg he kept Benson on the list last year, borderline young guys who are not clearly established).

The article included some quotes, not just Wheeler copy, so that was cool (I posted two to Cherny's prospect thread).

 

[timorous me]

Mukh might have been cut off because of age. I lost interest

It was mentioned in the first paragraph

 

[LadyStanley]

 

[Star Platinum]

It was mentioned in the first paragraph

I still support the loss of interest anyway