It’s Pagnotta so… you know. In fact, it’s a page reporting a pagnotta quote. So double skepticism, but it’s the offseason and I’m bored.
Sharks fans what is Grier offering up to go from Misa to Schaefer?
It’s Pagnotta so… you know. In fact, it’s a page reporting a pagnotta quote. So double skepticism, but it’s the offseason and I’m bored.
Sharks fans what is Grier offering up to go from Misa to Schaefer?
It’s Pagnotta so… you know. In fact, it’s a page reporting a pagnotta quote. So double skepticism, but it’s the offseason and I’m bored.
Sharks fans what is Grier offering up to go from Misa to Schaefer?
Thats the kind of deal that sets back the sharks rebuild a good bit. Would be horrible valueif they'd offer #2 & Dickinson, I'd sure listen
Mute point because Dickinson is worth #3 in this draft all on his own.if they'd offer #2 & Dickinson, I'd sure listen
Well you see that is the thing, it depends on your perspective.Thats the kind of deal that sets back the sharks rebuild a good bit. Would be horrible value
Just a head's up, I'm not a Isles fans and regarding your post, it's not only Isles fans but the entirety on the industry that places Schaefer at number 1. There's a significant gap at 1-2 & a even bigger gap between 2-3. There's a clear concensus no.1 for 2025Mute point because Dickinson is worth #3 in this draft all on his own.
It’s funny how Isles fans have convinced themselves that Schaefer being the consensus #1 overall means that he’s head and shoulders above Misa. That’s simply not the case.
Fantasize about getting Dickinson, Eklund, our 2026 1st, whatever you want. It’s not happening.
but then we miss out on the chance to finally get someone approaching a 1DWouldn’t be a bad idea for the Isles so they can finally get something approaching a 1C
he's not.Mute point because Dickinson is worth #3 in this draft all on his own.
It’s funny how Isles fans have convinced themselves that Schaefer being the consensus #1 overall means that he’s head and shoulders above Misa. That’s simply not the case.
Fantasize about getting Dickinson, Eklund, our 2026 1st, whatever you want. It’s not happening.
Who says there’s a significant gap between one and two? Again, Schaefer being consensus #1 is true hut it doesn’t mean there’s a significant gap between him and Misa. The Athletic did a round table with a bunch of prospect writers and they agreed that Schaefer was #1 but that Misa was in the same tier and that the the gap was Misa and the rest of the field.Just a head's up, I'm not an Isles fans and regarding your post, it's not only Isles fans but the entirety on the industry that places Schaefer at number 1. There's a significant gap at 1-2 & an even bigger gap between 2-3. There's a clear concensus no.1 for 2025
He is. But I am wildly curious who you from the 2025 draft you would take over him.he's not.
Again, this is absolutely f***ing horrible for the Sharks. They aren’t giving up #2 and another top-5 pick for Schaefer and a mid 1st.Islanders and Sharks swap picks.
The condition is that the Islanders get the higher of the two picks next year. No protection.
If the Islanders pick ends up higher than San Jose's, they get nothing. The value is in the additional unprotected shot at #1 next year.
This. Better to have two blue chip prospects than one slightly better blue chip prospectThats the kind of deal that sets back the sharks rebuild a good bit. Would be horrible value
Islanders got a long way to go before they have anything resembling a dynasty buildAnd still the Islanders say no. Schaefer is Potvin. Insane to trade that away and say good bye to a dynasty,
Lets pump the breaks a littleAnd still the Islanders say no. Schaefer is Potvin. Insane to trade that away and say good bye to a dynasty,