I'm really out of touch with any team's roster building philosophy, but I've heard that some of Canada's choices are rather questionable. Could anyone care to elaborate?
And, about the upset..
Lovely, lovely work. I have nothing against Canada and nothing for Latvia, but holy smokes. Every single Canadian in that building was expecting a win. The look on those faces: priceless.
This was touched on above here, but the big problem with Hockey Canada is that they treat international tournaments like they're league GMs building a regular NHL team instead of a group that can basically craft an all-star team out of the biggest talent pool in the world.
Countries like Latvia or Germany, or even Finland to some extent build teams with defined roles and traditional line structures because partially they've historically learned to offset any differences in overall talent level with sacrificing, team-first, defense-first, selfless players who will supplicate themselves to a system designed to overcome their weaknesses. Canada doesn't have to and shouldn't do this because they still represent the single biggest hockey-player-producing nation on the planet and generally have a slightly disproportionate share of the pool of super high-end talent. They could probably roll 3 punishing scoring lines and a 4th line that would be most teams' defensively responsible second line in most years. They could do 3 D pairings with mobile, agile, players where there's a dedicated point-man/offensive D on every pair. But they don't. The pretend at being poor and believe they have to make a team like they're working with a shallow pool of players or a salary cap in play or something.
So they want things like a 3rd line of energy guys and a 4th line that's a checking line, and a bottom defensive pairing that's chiefly concerned with shutdown defensive work. It meant that they left offensively talented players at home like Parekh and Yakemchuk, Beckett Sennecke, Michael Misa, and Andrew Cristall and now they're paying for it as they looked lost offensively against Latvia and didn't exactly blow the doors off Finland. Plus of the players that made the team they took Dickinson, the
highest scoring blueliner in the country heading into the tournament and shoehorned him into a 3rd pairing defensive role where, as Jux notes, it very much looks like he's been told to play ultra-conservative, no-risk hockey that sacrifices all of his offensive opportunity in order to maintain absolute defensive coverage. He runs the second best powerplay in the OHL and the Knights collectively have the most PP goals and he doesn't sniff a second of PP time on Canada, even as the non-QB on PP2. Carson Rekhopf is one of the OHL's leading scorers and he's basically a healthy scratch but is also not even officially on the roster. They fail to score goals and then don't talk about all the offence that's left on the bench, pressbox, or halfway across the country. instead they talk about how the guys need to buckle down and believe in the system and play the game "the right way".
They're a five-star restaurant that acts like they're McDonalds and then gets surprised when nobody wants their cardboard burgers given that the people know they could be eating the best steak you've ever had instead.