aragorn
Do The Right Thing
- Aug 8, 2004
- 28,659
- 9,147
Drafted | G | P | P/GP | Signed | |
Shane Pinto | 32nd Overall | 20 | 35 | 0.43 | |
Niclas Bergfors | 23rd Overall | 21 | 44 | 0.54 | $1,269,200 x 1yrs |
Mark Jankowski | 21st Overall | 17 | 25 | 0.35 | $1,761,850 x 2yrs |
Jason Pominville | 55th Overall | 18 | 30 | 0.53 | $1,962,250 x 3yrs |
R.J. Umberger | 16th Overall | 20 | 38 | 0.52 | $2,179,350 x 2yrs |
Connor Brown | 156th Overall | 20 | 36 | 0.44 | $2,338,000 x 3yrs |
Denis Gurianov | 12th Overall | 20 | 29 | 0.45 | $2,613,550 x 2yrs |
Chris Kreider | 19th Overall | 17 | 37 | 0.56 | $2,997,650 x 2yrs |
Brad Marchand | 71st Overall | 21 | 41 | 0.53 | $3,248,150 x 2yrs |
The most relevant part would be to list the 10.2.c contracts that were signed with teams that had very tight cap constraints.Criteria:
- 2005 onwards (Salary Cap world)
- 25 to 49 points in Rookie season
- 17 to 24 goals in Rookie season
- Coming off ELC
- Under 0.75 P/GP
- Under age 24
Notes:
I based contracts on cap% at the time of signing, and applied it to the current 83.500 cap
I'm not sure how to check if any of these were 10.2(c)
Here's the entire list:
Drafted G P P/GP Signed Shane Pinto 32nd Overall 20 35 0.43 Niclas Bergfors 23rd Overall 21 44 0.54 $1,269,200 x 1yrs Mark Jankowski 21st Overall 17 25 0.35 $1,761,850 x 2yrs Jason Pominville 55th Overall 18 30 0.53 $1,962,250 x 3yrs R.J. Umberger 16th Overall 20 38 0.52 $2,179,350 x 2yrs Connor Brown 156th Overall 20 36 0.44 $2,338,000 x 3yrs Denis Gurianov 12th Overall 20 29 0.45 $2,613,550 x 2yrs Chris Kreider 19th Overall 17 37 0.56 $2,997,650 x 2yrs Brad Marchand 71st Overall 21 41 0.53 $3,248,150 x 2yrs
The most relevant part would be to list the 10.2.c contracts that were signed with teams that had very tight cap constraints.
Bergfors would have been a 10.2(c) RFA. I believe the rest met the professional seasons requirements to be typical RFA.I don't know how to check that as CapFriendly doesn't seem to list it.
If someone understands 10.2(c) games played better than I do, it's probably easy enough to decider though? Not sure.
Bergfors at a tad under 1.300 for 1yr is encouraging though.
Bergfors would have been a 10.2(c) RFA. I believe the rest met the professional seasons requirements to be typical RFA.
Edit: Nevermind, I think Bergfors had enough Pro seasons too. I don't think any of those guys were 10.2(c)
Might be that Pinto is waiting on Murray to decide on Pinto. Right now, the Sens can say they can't afford to give him what he wants and fill out the roster, if Murray gets bought out, he can push a bit harder for a couple extra 100kare we waiting on Murray to decide pinto?
He did step up & play the 2nd line C role when Norris went down & did fairly well as basically a rookie centre. It's not very often a rookie plays C in the top six, usually they are exceptional players. I'm not saying he is exceptional, but he has a lot of good traits that good centres have.It's not an apples to apples comparison, but Cam York just got 2x$1.6 in Philly as a 10.2(c) RFA
Cam York (D): 22 years old, 87 games, 30 points
Shane Pinto: 22 years old, 99 games, 42 points
York got squeezed pretty good and I'm honestly not sure where people think Pinto is getting the leverage for $2.5+ million. Obviously if PD can move out some money and can lock him into more term it might be ideal, but I also see a world where he sings 1x$1.5-$1.75.
2m is good value for a 3C who is going to be relied on to be very good. That 3rd line is important and he is an important piece on it.He did step up & play the 2nd line C role when Norris went down & did fairly well as basically a rookie centre. It's not very often a rookie plays C in the top six, usually they are exceptional players. I'm not saying he is exceptional, but he has a lot of good traits that good centres have.
He has good size for a centre, he has a very good hard shot, , good hockey IQ, he hits, he is good at faceoffs, he is a good two way centre & plays well defensively & on the PK. He also filled in on the PP. It's more likely he gets bridged & it will probably be at a salary they can afford after they add another top 9 player would be my guess & that could be around $2.
If you go to CapFriendly, it has some calculations based on 10.2.c that are specific to Pinto.I don't know how to check that as CapFriendly doesn't seem to list it.
If someone understands 10.2(c) games played better than I do, it's probably easy enough to decider though? Not sure.
Bergfors at a tad under 1.300 for 1yr is encouraging though.
Shane Pinto is every bit the maybe that York is, despite our collective hopes. It’s the reason the team is in a position to squeeze him on a short term deal.Cam York is a maybe.
I've been saying for months that he'll get about $1.5 - $1.6 m.It's not an apples to apples comparison, but Cam York just got 2x$1.6 in Philly as a 10.2(c) RFA
Cam York (D): 22 years old, 87 games, 30 points
Shane Pinto: 22 years old, 99 games, 42 points
York got squeezed pretty good and I'm honestly not sure where people think Pinto is getting the leverage for $2.5+ million. Obviously if PD can move out some money and can lock him into more term it might be ideal, but I also see a world where he sings 1x$1.5-$1.75.
He needs to get a 1 year to get over the hump here (if Sens want to continue to add) ..Shane Pinto is every bit the maybe that York is, despite our collective hopes. It’s the reason the team is in a position to squeeze him on a short term deal.
If every 100k is going to count this season he’s unfortunately the one who is going to need to take a haircut.
I think it would be a calc of his QO not a 10.2c (10.2c doesn't have a calculation)I've been saying for months that he'll get about $1.5 - $1.6 m.
The 2nd url in Post #15 links to a CapFriendly calculation for Pinto's 10.2.c.
Hoffman got the equivalent of a 1 yr 2.3 mil deal (adjusted for the current cap) in arbitration coming off a 48pt 27 g season as a rookie (actually, I think he might have lost his rookie status just barely).He needs to get a 1 year to get over the hump here (if Sens want to continue to add) ..
He has no leverage. I think 2m on a 1 year is ok. They may try to squeeze him more. I would stay at 1 year if I am Pinto. 20 goals as a rookie..
In what world will he get 1.9? lolI'm gonna guess we get lucky with his contract and it's gonna be 3 years, 1.9 per.
Ya, you're right. It says that in the title - ooof. Is that dated info as well? I couldn't tell.I think it would be a calc of his QO not a 10.2c (10.2c doesn't have a calculation)
You have to consider our players developing internally. We come into the season with a much better D corps than last season. I also believe we have a much better goaltending situation. Our bottom 6 needs to shape out a little bit more, but that could come from within our AHL/NHL team. Speaking of depth, Pinto can basically slot in anywhere on our roster in the forward ranks. I just hope we can hang on to him.He is going to end up with a bridge deal between 2.5 and 3 million per for 2 years is my guess. Sens are going to have 0 depth this year. Really have to hope players like Pinto, Stutzle, Sanderson and Brannstrom take another big step in development. Big bounce back years from Batherson and Chabot. Have to hope that Greig, Sokolov, JBD and Jarventie are NHL players or atleast can push for NHL spots.
You have to consider our players developing internally. We come into the season with a much better D corps than last season. I also believe we have a much better goaltending situation. Our bottom 6 needs to shape out a little bit more, but that could come from within our AHL/NHL team. Speaking of depth, Pinto can basically slot in anywhere on our roster in the forward ranks. I just hope we can hang on to him.