Shanahan gone Update May 22: contract will not be renewed | Page 10 | HFBoards - NHL Message Board and Forum for National Hockey League

Shanahan gone Update May 22: contract will not be renewed

Anyone know more about Shanahan's office experience. Did he do a lot of off-ice office and admin work?

All wiki has is after he retired from playing, the league immediately hired him as a VP of business dev. He did some VP roles for 5 years and then Leafs hired him as President.
 
  • Like
Reactions: seventieslord
I expect him to announce no more President's role, the expansion of Treliving's responsibilities, and that he will now report directly to Pelley / the board.

(Hilarious irony in the fact that Dubas was basically fired for wanting to streamline the decision-making process and bypass the President after trades to blow up the core 4 were vetoed, and now it's Shanahan being shitcanned and the President's role being removed after the core 4 failed).

The trade was Knies+ for Hagel
 
  • Like
Reactions: AvroArrow
Brendan Shanahan,
IMG_5949.gif
 
It always had an architect/engineer feeling to me. One decides what the team should look like and the other had has to figure out how to make it possible.
Having two guys working together on the same page makes a ton of sense............trust me Marc Bergevin was a mess, and no one to report to but the owner, who was busy with condos and at that point let Bergevin do what he wanted..............you don't want one guy with the all the control. Ask the Pens fans....
 
It always had an architect/engineer feeling to me. One decides what the team should look like and the other had has to figure out how to make it possible.
The two individuals should essentially work in tandem (even though President ranks above GM in the organizational hierarchy).
 
  • Like
Reactions: AllHeartNoSkill
The first domino falls. About time.
Now, let´s see who´ll get the position and what will trickle down from that moment onward.

Why do they need someone else to "get the position"? Why do they need more than a coaching staff and a general manager? Never understood it tbh. Let the one guy make the decisions and then there's more accountability and less finger pointing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pinto
I have this feeling that Shanahan had a great interview with Toronto. A fan turned executive type interview. Passionate, many ideas of long overdue directives that the organization needed. The tear down, the acceptance of lean years, with a vision toward future success. Legends row, alumni relations and honoring. All great things that he did. He went big name hunting. He got all the big fish when he started.
Ultimately after the fervor of taking this franchise in a new and exciting direction subsided and he had to execute his position within a franchise that didn't need retroactive change but instead just high quality results based decisions he faltered. In my opinion, ultimately that is because he is not a great executive. He got his rookie position and succeeded only in the opening stages when his youthful Fandom carried his decisions. When we needed to move forward as a franchise in good standing he made few if any good decisions. (None that come to mind).
 
In our case we had GM - Pres - CEO - Board

In most cases it's GM - Pres - Owner

Correct?

Isn't the CEO essentially part of the board? But directly is responsible for the hockey operations? I know many big teams have that kind of setup like Pittsburgh, Rangers, etc.
 
First step, hopefully more changes follow from a managerial standpoint (not sure in what capacity), but this alone is not enough. Ownership deserves some heat for being stubborn and not letting him go years ago let alone last year, which I'm guessing they were letting his contract play out.

With that being said, was always appreciative of how he turned this franchise around in his first few years, but this was LONG overdue.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Ad

Ad