Crow
Registered User
- May 19, 2014
- 4,329
- 4,966
They were better without him than with him.If Chicago got better without him then why did they finish 2nd to last in points? Stop it
This isn’t that complicated.
The only times we had decent stretches with either coach in which the hawks played well and won games, Seth was not on the ice due to injury or being traded.
Even on your team he had the worst plus minus out of everyone on a per game basis. By a lot.
You stop it.
Last edited: