- Jan 30, 2010
- 1,322
- 3,939
True, but immediately signing to disastrous contracts and trading for Karlsson just can't be overlooked. That sequence was GMing malpractice.Whilst I think there are absolutely fair criticisms that should be directed at Dubas, this really misses the context that the Pens were already failing when he was hired, and everyone knows he was hired under instruction not to rebuild (which they needed to do).
Whilst I don't think trading for Karlsson was the smartest move, I don't necessarily think it was a bad move. It's definitely worked out for the Sharks but the reality is that he moved a bunch of players that weren't producing for a player coming off a great season on an awful team. The issue was I don't think Karlsson works in Sullivan's systems.True, but immediately signing to disastrous contracts and trading for Karlsson just can't be overlooked. That sequence was GMing malpractice.
Great post OP. How about a TLDR of the article?
Karlsson was obviously not a great fit, Dubas should have had the foresight to know this.Whilst I don't think trading for Karlsson was the smartest move, I don't necessarily think it was a bad move. It's definitely worked out for the Sharks but the reality is that he moved a bunch of players that weren't producing for a player coming off a great season on an awful team. The issue was I don't think Karlsson works in Sullivan's systems.
No it didn't. Graves was visibly declining in the second half of the year in NJ. He was terrible. The contract was bad the moment he was signed. Anyone paying attention should have anticipated this.Ryan Graves contract looked solid when it was signed. Even though his production really wasn't there last season, he finished as a +10 and I don't think was particularly bad. He is shooting far less than his time with the Avs and Devils, so again, is it a player not fitting into a system?
Dubas comes across as very arrogant and Seravalli hated him since his Toronto days. I assume something happened between them. Maybe he asked for an interview and Dubas said no.
Duh. Is his next article titled “Hitler. The more I read about the guy, the less I like him”?
Weirdly personal hit piece. Lots of TML chatter for an article ostensibly about Pittsburgh, not sure if he’s carrying water for someone in the leafs org or what.
Dubas got the boot because he dare suggested the core be broken up.
Great post OP. How about a TLDR of the article?
What exactly was the GM supposed to do with 2 time all star Tristan Garry exactly ? Was Dubas supposed to have some deep seeded belief that he was going to bust ?He's not wrong
Karlsson was a bad move because Pittsburgh desperately needed defensive guys and had Letang. He needed to find the exact opposite of Karlsson.Whilst I don't think trading for Karlsson was the smartest move, I don't necessarily think it was a bad move. It's definitely worked out for the Sharks but the reality is that he moved a bunch of players that weren't producing for a player coming off a great season on an awful team. The issue was I don't think Karlsson works in Sullivan's systems.
Ryan Graves contract looked solid when it was signed. Even though his production really wasn't there last season, he finished as a +10 and I don't think was particularly bad. He is shooting far less than his time with the Avs and Devils, so again, is it a player not fitting into a system?
I just don't think Dubas has been the disaster he is being made out to be here. Seravalli, from memory, was always extremely critical of Dubas in Toronto as well despite Dubas constantly adding toughness to the Leafs that all 'experts' claimed they needed. Dubas got the boot because he dare suggested the core be broken up.
He's not wrong