Golden_Jet
Registered User
- Sep 21, 2005
- 26,362
- 13,667
That’s good, as Ottawa isn’t looking to get worse.Timo ain’t waiving to go from a contender in Jersey to a cancer culture Ottawa team.
That’s good, as Ottawa isn’t looking to get worse.Timo ain’t waiving to go from a contender in Jersey to a cancer culture Ottawa team.
I think that’s fair and around what I had in mindA 1st round pick and maybe a prospect like Unger Sörum?
I would definitely consider Tkachuk for Barzal+ if we're able to move Norris. Having a Stutzle-Barzal 1-2 punch is a potential 200+ point duo.there’s a few reasons. #1 was that his first season was his only season with Tavares on the team, and teams were focused on stopping him, not Barzal. Then Tavares leaves and we get Barry Trotz who drastically changed the system and made a huge focus on turning Barzal into a 200 foot player. He also never really had a bonafied first line player on his line until last year with Horvat. I agree that he hits 100 in the right situation.
Anyway a Barzal trade would need to involve Tkachuk or Stutzle, and we add.
What would you offer?Brady Tkachuk to the Blues in the summer.
Brady's NMC kicks in this June, so if we wanna trade him has to be well before then or else as you said, he will strong arm his destination.I really do wonder if this off-season sees a Tkachuk trade request. And at that point, maybe he pulls a Matthew and strong arms his destination.
I’d like to do it straight up lololWhat would you like in a Barzal/Tkachuk deal?
Would Wild fans swap Boldy for Tkachuk one on one?
I really do wonder if this off-season sees a Tkachuk trade request. And at that point, maybe he pulls a Matthew and strong arms his destination.
Imo Stutzle is the guy they should move. One for one for a hard to play against forward. A guy to compliment Tkatchuk. Not that this would happen, but a guy who plays like Suzuki.
They should have kept Chychrun and traded Chabot. Been saying it the entire time.
Pinto or Norris makes the most sense after him.
I know every fan is trying to pry Tkachuk out with a less than value package, but if I’m Fitzgerald, I would try and see if something could get done around a Meier for Tkachuk swap.
Meier does have an NMC so it might be all moot, but would love to have Brady on the Devils. Meier hasn’t quite fit in well to date either.
At this point I don't think the coaching is the problem. They've gone through all sorts. At the end of the day, your best players need to be good enough to win hockey games. It's very clear in watching the Sens that you simply cannot expect to win on a regular basis with guys like Tkachuk, Norris, Chabot making what they do and being in the roles they are. Add in Giroux finally taking a step back, Perron probably being too old for a top 9 role, and you have a roster with a lot of holes even if it doesn't look that way at first glance.Ottawa is my second favorite team.When I look at this team my concern is what is behind the bench.Green Baumgartner Yeo was a cluster f__k in Vancouver.I hated them there and now hating them on the Sens...I don't see any light at the end of the tunnel until they are gone.Very bad coaches.
At this point I don't think the coaching is the problem. They've gone through all sorts. At the end of the day, your best players need to be good enough to win hockey games. It's very clear in watching the Sens that you simply cannot expect to win on a regular basis with guys like Tkachuk, Norris, Chabot making what they do and being in the roles they are. Add in Giroux finally taking a step back, Perron probably being too old for a top 9 role, and you have a roster with a lot of holes even if it doesn't look that way at first glance.
It's the level of talent, not the coaches.
Any interest from Sens fans in Svechnikov as a base for a Tkachuk trade? What would you be looking for on top of Svech to make it a fair deal if so?