Which part or the argument don't you like, Bonk? That there's value in third? I picked 2012 because four years is about the amount of time it takes to know what you have. But OK, 2013 - Pesce, Duclair, Andrighetto. Borkstrand.
The odds are better of a McLeod etc. panning out, and landing a guy like that in third, than they are of Brown panning out.
Whether or not the move was ballsy or stupid remains to be seen, but I'd feel safer playing the odds than trusting the Sens management to know how a teenager is going to develop.
Which part or the argument don't you like, Bonk? That there's value in third? I picked 2012 because four years is about the amount of time it takes to know what you have. But OK, 2013 - Pesce, Duclair, Andrighetto. Borkstrand.
The odds are better of a McLeod etc. panning out, and landing a guy like that in third, than they are of Brown panning out.
Whether or not the move was ballsy or stupid remains to be seen, but I'd feel safer playing the odds than trusting the Sens management to know how a teenager is going to develop.
Am i the only one who thinks Columbus is the biggest looser with their selection? not that i don't like PLD but its obviously a need over BPA pick.
Am i the only one who thinks Columbus is the biggest looser with their selection? not that i don't like PLD but its obviously a need over BPA pick.
First time post
I was really happy with the Logan Brown pick. I didn't know a lot of the prospects in this draft, except the guys around the Sens pick, but Brown was my favourite. The third round pick has a very small chance at ever making the NHL, let alone becoming anything of relevance. The Sens probably got wind that New Jersey was eyeing Brown, or somebody was trying to trade with the Devils to select Brown. The Sens forfeited the very small chance at getting an NHL player with the 3rd pick to secure the guy they really liked. I love the move
We wont know for years, For all we know they are geniuses and have reason to believe Puljujarvi busts or doesnt live up to expectations
The Hockey News also predicted the Sens would come in last in the east the 2 first years when Maclean coached and they went to the playoffs. They seem a very Toronto centric publication.http://www.thehockeynews.com/blog/winners-and-losers-from-the-first-round-of-the-draft/
Says Ottawa is the losers here also.
Personally Brown was a target of mine even when he was ranked in the 20's. IMO Ottawa did what they had to do to get the player they wanted. They probably have an inside track on this kid since he spent time in Ottawa over the last few seasons working out with the club.
According to Dorion he said "there's a guy we really want" to Shero after MTL picked at 9. Maybe they had intel that Ottawa wanted Brown, but it doesn't sound like Dorion straight up told NJ he wanted Brown.
So either NJ knew Ottawa wanted Brown, made a good move to get a "free" pick, or NJ looked at the board after COL picked and determined that there were more than 2 prospects that they had ranked equally enough that it was worth it to pick up an extra asset to let Ottawa have the first choice.
Dorion took a calculated risk to ensure he'd get a guy who he probably had ranked much higher than those who'd be available if he was taken off the board by a different team at 11. It was worth it.
First time post
I was really happy with the Logan Brown pick. I didn't know a lot of the prospects in this draft, except the guys around the Sens pick, but Brown was my favourite. The third round pick has a very small chance at ever making the NHL, let alone becoming anything of relevance. The Sens probably got wind that New Jersey was eyeing Brown, or somebody was trying to trade with the Devils to select Brown. The Sens forfeited the very small chance at getting an NHL player with the 3rd pick to secure the guy they really liked. I love the move
Am i the only one who thinks Columbus is the biggest looser with their selection? not that i don't like PLD but its obviously a need over BPA pick.
I do not love the move but I don't hate it either as a third round pick does not have a high likelihood of yielding an NHL player. The Senators could have retained the pick and drafted 12th at which point they could have taken Brown, McLeod , Chychrun's or any of the other players drafted later, which many of posters would like too. Only time will tell if this was a bright right move. I am OK with it because the cost is low. No big deal.
Now I want to see a big deal like signing Stamkos! THAT would be worth getting excited about!
The Sens fans that wanted Ottawa to go high risk high reward should be happy with this draft
But the Sens could have had Brown ranked very high, and were happy that he had fallen this low. Guys like McLeod and Chychrun could have been a big drop off, in their eyes.
Im confused. How did this become a 5 page thread? Its a complete non-story.
Im confused. How did this become a 5 page thread? Its a complete non-story.