guitarguyvic
Registered User
- Mar 31, 2010
- 9,486
- 8,228
I have turned on Timo as well. First excuse was he was new to the team. Then it was injury. Now what is it? We traded away Zetterlund for an older, overpaid version of him.
8,5m for a 55pt winger
I hope we win one by the end of the day.I hope we win a game again before the end of the season ...
You’re just lumping a bunch of games together that have nothing to do with each other.Oh please. It’s been nearly going on a month of this same crap.
I really thought we were getting guy with a lot of upside there, but I don't think he progressed from his days in SJ. Good player .. just not the star I thought he would be.timo should really be traded, I just don't know how they would pull this off
dude isn't worth the money
Shawn McEachern. The pride of Waltham.What was the answer?
Zetterlund is putting up the same numbers with a crappy Sharks team at a tenth of the price.
Sure, compare a guy under team control with no contract leverage (and had no real comparables before current contract) with someone who scored 40 goals.
They do have similar numbers, Meier is slightly ahead without any PP time, and Zetterlund is playing major minutes for a bad team.
Meier has 50 PIM and Zetterlund has 8. I love Zetterlund and wish we didn't have to trade him but they're not quite the same - I do think Zetterlund could become that.
too bad he's regressed year after year and is a streaky scorer that doesn't bring anything when not scoringWell, when we re-signed him he was a 60+ point winger, with 40 goals. I'd like him to be a consistent 30-35 goal, 60-65 point player and his contract is exactly right for that.
"Dominant Offensively in the first" says Weekes...they scored 0 goals.