GDT: Senators @ Canadiens March 19th Part 2 of 3 - Part 2

Status
Not open for further replies.

habtastic

Registered User
Aug 17, 2007
10,529
116
Montrealer in Boston
Too bad Byron couldn't get that 21st, but in reality, the Sens still got burned badly, offside or not (by a hair).

D man smashed his stick on the net. That's good enough for me.
 

Uncle Gary

Registered User
Apr 12, 2014
5,206
2,583
So glad we didn't end up with Boucher. Bad system, bad strategy, bad coaching. Julien is much, much better. Boucher is great for the budget Sens though who can't afford top talent.
 

Kimota

ROY DU NORD!!!
Nov 4, 2005
40,036
15,212
Les Plaines D'Abraham
I hate how you can challenge offside.

This is hurting the game. When they put the rule into place this was never about that. It was about coaches wanting to make sure if a puck was in. Now it's about offsides. It's mind-boggling. Imagine all the goals that would have been ruled no goals with all the missed offsides throughout the years.
 

lou4gehrig

Registered User
Aug 2, 2005
5,728
194
If you get -3 as a d-man, you should be automatically eliminated from Norris consideration. Just my opinion.

This would be the 4th time this year Karllson's done it.
 

sandysan

Registered User
Dec 7, 2011
24,834
6,388
I don't. I think it's a good rule and if it was the other way around, we'd appreciate it.

It should be the plane of the line, why the GM's didn't change it is beyond me. Guys drag the foot all the time they shouldn't have to drag it on the ice
 

Bloumeister

Meister Mojo Rising
Apr 30, 2010
10,926
5,007
Planet Of Sound
twitter.com
Time for a repost? ;)

C7U0xkCXgAQzYNH.jpg


Help me, Senatron, you're my only hope

(check out full-sized 'shoop here)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad