Sounds about right to me.Not Pinto, Greig our the 2024 first.
Korpisalo (salary purposes), Sogaard/Merilainen, Boston's 1st, Jarventie (+ Sokolov and/or Thomson if they want them)
or
Chychrun + Korpisalo + Boston's 1st for Saros + Carrier
No way I'd pay a king's ransom for a goalie. Next year you have Saros and Forsberg and the year after Saros and Sogaard
What's there to question? You don't think Staios has inquired about him? Ottawa clearly needs to upgrade that position so of course we're going to be linked to a top goalie that may be available.I feel like Pagnotta ebbs between being completely unreliable to somewhat plugged in, so hard to say if there is legitimacy to this.
Sounds about right to me.
That's the media formula.1. Ottawa has terrible goaltending.
2. Top goaltender is available.
3. Add "Ottawa" to list of teams.
100% Grieg is the ask.Nashville has Askarov coming up. He's dominating the AHL. They don't need a goalie in return.
To get Saros, Sens need to send a goalie back or find a way to dump one.
And Nashville looks at the Sens prospect pool and laughs so hard they let out a fart.
Then they say, "Your offer starts with Greig."
Sounds like a law firm.Saros and Sogaard
1. Ottawa has terrible goaltending.
2. Top goaltender is available.
3. Add "Ottawa" to list of teams.
The rumour is they are listening but if he isn't moved at the deadline it probably happens in the offseason. Presumably they do it because Askarov is coming and perhaps they aren't confident Saros wants to stick around through their retool only to be pushed out by the team wanting to move on to Askarov.Why would Smashville be trading him? Because they are going into a long rebuild that they will start off by calling a quick 3 yr retool? If not, i'd be suspicious. If so surely they want draft picks and young prospects.
I remember back in the days of Roy, Brodeur. and a couple others maybe Joseph, Turco, the joke was that we should call the game goalie instead of hockey. Philly was almost the poster boy for having great teams let down by mediocre goalies, as they figured if you arent getting cream of the crop then no use paying for the top of the 2nd best heap when the bottom of the 2nd best heap will be just as good.
Then we went through years of teams winning without the so called elite goalie. Now, well as always, having that Craig Anderson like 'Start the Car' game over and over from your goalie is always that missing piece. Id pay dearly for it. Could we outbid the Devils? Would the team that gets Markstrom instead have lost the battle but won the war by paying less?
Ahh right, that intriguing southpaw Askarov. Well that would be interesting intel to get whether Saros wants to test UFA. GMs might want to test that pressure point. But whoever signs him is likely going to have to make him one of the top paid goalies in the league. We'd need to manage cap space at the expense of assets to pull it off im thinkingThe rumour is they are listening but if he isn't moved at the deadline it probably happens in the offseason. Presumably they do it because Askarov is coming and perhaps they aren't confident Saros wants to stick around through their retool only to be pushed out by the team wanting to move on to Askarov.
Yes, let's ruin yet another goaltender in this league.
Can we fix the overall team defense before we spend a fortune in assets for yet another goalie?
Make sure to create a thread on the main boards about how shitty the prospect pool is so that others can trash the team so that you can join in.Nashville has Askarov coming up. He's dominating the AHL. They don't need a goalie in return.
To get Saros, Sens need to send a goalie back or find a way to dump one.
And Nashville looks at the Sens prospect pool and laughs so hard they let out a fart.
Then they say, "Your offer starts with Greig."
Pay whatever price they ask for