wilka91*
Registered User
- May 5, 2004
- 4,251
- 1
Boucicaut said:Overtime should be 20 mins instead of 10 and played 4 on 4.
it is already played 4 on 4
Boucicaut said:Overtime should be 20 mins instead of 10 and played 4 on 4.
wilka91 said:it is already played 4 on 4
SectionX said:nobody believs in sweden, and still we are the only team that beat canada after they haven't lost in years.
Boucicaut said:We beat them, if the disallowed goal is taken into account
Sweden beat our, what, 2b team? No big deal. Don't make it sound like you beat us in a best on best game with something on the line.SectionX said:nobody believs in sweden, and still we are the only team that beat canada after they haven't lost in years.
Don't forget this is Sweden's B team as well. Forsberg, Naslund, Sundin, Lidstrom, Modin, Kim Johnsson, Ragnarsson, Holmstrom. Every team is missing key players.ryz said:Sweden beat our, what, 2b team? No big deal. Don't make it sound like you beat us in a best on best game with something on the line.
As for the games I have to go with Canada - Czech in the final but I don't want that. I wan't a Canada - Sweden final in the worst way. After the endless whining over the Nash - ref thing (should have been trouble, but wasn't) and the Walker - scoresheet mishap I want Canada to put the boots to Sweden. And since it will be a game that actually means something, we probably will.
SectionX said:nobody believs in sweden, and still we are the only team that beat canada after they haven't lost in years.
ryz said:Sweden beat our, what, 2b team? No big deal. Don't make it sound like you beat us in a best on best game with something on the line.
As for the games I have to go with Canada - Czech in the final but I don't want that. I wan't a Canada - Sweden final in the worst way. After the endless whining over the Nash - ref thing (should have been trouble, but wasn't) and the Walker - scoresheet mishap I want Canada to put the boots to Sweden. And since it will be a game that actually means something, we probably will.
Don't get me wrong. I completely agree with that. Thats my point. I'm not sure about Europe but this tourney still means basically NOTHING to North Americans. It's probably the 5th most important tourney behind the Olympics, World Cup, World Juniors and the Stanley Cup play-offs. Regardless of what our Euro competition thinks, winning or losing the next 2 games in this tourney means basically nothing to Canadians. If we win it's like eating a few potato chips between meals to tide us over. If we lose, no biggie. I'm suprised it is such a big deal on these boards, and with the international hockey community. Now, if it was a true best on best with players that have actually been playing more than 3 weeks it might be a different story.norrisnick said:Don't forget this is Sweden's B team as well. Forsberg, Naslund, Sundin, Lidstrom, Modin, Kim Johnsson, Ragnarsson, Holmstrom. Every team is missing key players.
ryz said:Sweden beat our, what, 2b team? No big deal. Don't make it sound like you beat us in a best on best game with something on the line.
As for the games I have to go with Canada - Czech in the final but I don't want that. I wan't a Canada - Sweden final in the worst way. After the endless whining over the Nash - ref thing (should have been trouble, but wasn't) and the Walker - scoresheet mishap I want Canada to put the boots to Sweden. And since it will be a game that actually means something, we probably will.
winning or losing the next 2 games in this tourney means basically nothing to Canadians
SectionX said:walker? we didn't complain about that. GET YOUR FACTS RIGHT. I hope Russia pounds Canada 11-0 and put those whiners to rest.
so that's why TSN, sportsnet, SLAM SPORTS! analyzing everything in and out.
btw we are missing our best players also.
syc said:For the first part..you can always dream and you Sweds have been the whiniest fans of this whole tourney.
On the second part yes tsn and such are talking about these games but hockey fans in Canada don't really care all that much if we win or lose. THE WORLD CHAMPIONSHIPS MEAN VERY LITTLE TO CANADIANS! TSN and SN are only talking about it because they have nothing else to talk about.
I hope we see some typical Swedish international goaltending ala Salo style.
Go Nash!!!
syc said:For the first part..you can always dream and you Sweds have been the whiniest fans of this whole tourney.
On the second part yes tsn and such are talking about these games but hockey fans in Canada don't really care all that much if we win or lose. THE WORLD CHAMPIONSHIPS MEAN VERY LITTLE TO CANADIANS! TSN and SN are only talking about it because they have nothing else to talk about.
I hope we see some typical Swedish international goaltending ala Salo style.
Go Nash!!!
syc said:For the first part..you can always dream and you Sweds have been the whiniest fans of this whole tourney.
On the second part yes tsn and such are talking about these games but hockey fans in Canada don't really care all that much if we win or lose. THE WORLD CHAMPIONSHIPS MEAN VERY LITTLE TO CANADIANS! TSN and SN are only talking about it because they have nothing else to talk about.
I hope we see some typical Swedish international goaltending ala Salo style.
Go Nash!!!
No,sectionX...Canada doesn't suck...but the post you responded to with that proclamation sure does...There are many Canadians(myself included) who put great value on the WC's...and alot of top players do as well. I am a "hardcore hockey fan" and I feel its part of my duty to acknowledge what this tourney represents...it is a world class tourney. with many of the top players in the world. It is always a a major accomplishment for whoever wins it.SectionX said:Canada sucks.
I don't know if you're Canadian Dude, but you sure as heck don't know anything about Canadian "hockey fans". You may be speaking for "NHL fans", but that is an entirely different animal.syc said:On the second part yes tsn and such are talking about these games but hockey fans in Canada don't really care all that much if we win or lose. THE WORLD CHAMPIONSHIPS MEAN VERY LITTLE TO CANADIANS!
gee whats up with that ? - we have a wack of swedes on the nucks - bunch of the canadian boys played in sweden - we would not in a million years say anything like that about you -SectionX said:Canada sucks.
Can't argue with anything you said there - everybody knows that is true, but it is still amazing hockey.wilka91 said:Canada invented the Canada Cup, a trophy made by Canadians and awarded at the tourney of the same name, where Canada plays all its games in Canada on Canadian-sized rinks, with Canadian refs, according to a schedule made by Canadians. Then thinking that it wasn't a very legitimate tournament Canada decided to call it World Cup, hoping that the Europeans would buy this crap.
Rocky Saginuts said:Can't argue with anything you said there - everybody knows that is true, but it is still amazing hockey.
Your diatribe about the Canada Cup, however, does not explain why Canada won the past two WC's and in Salt Lake (oh yeah, must be that conspiracy thing, eh?!?)
mr gib said:gee whats up with that ? - we have a wack of swedes on the nucks - bunch of the canadian boys played in sweden - we would not in a million years say anything like that about you -
no worries - if you had a seen us jumping around the tv after gagne tied it up - i care - but for the game and how great it is played at this level - should be a great day tomorrow - good luckSectionX said:dont take me serious, but it was hilarious when he said that no canadian cared about this championchip. Because it's not true.