SEG & Salt Lake City Close to Finalizing $900 million Deal for Arena Renovations and Sports District

The Feckless Puck

Registered Loser
Sponsor
Oct 26, 2006
18,727
11,955
As an outsider, I find it really fishy that SEG was talking about an all-new NHL arena while maintaining the NBA arena downtown, then as soon as they get the emergency relocation of the Coyotes Smith pivots to just renovating the existing building. Feels like a bait and switch to me.

I think, in fairness, it was the SLC politicians talking about a new hockey arena and the taxes they had raised for it. But it seems coincidental that the cost of the new hockey arena and the cost of SEG's entertainment district and Delta Center renovations are almost identical...
 
  • Like
Reactions: kickback256

StreetHawk

Registered User
Sep 30, 2017
27,162
10,282
I think, in fairness, it was the SLC politicians talking about a new hockey arena and the taxes they had raised for it. But it seems coincidental that the cost of the new hockey arena and the cost of SEG's entertainment district and Delta Center renovations are almost identical...
$900 mill seems like the price of a new arena doesn't it? Seattle, while keeping that roof plus adding another structure came in over $1 billion from their original $675 mill, then got bumped to $800 mill.

As long as the Delta Center location works,
 

Jormungandr

Registered User
Aug 14, 2002
3,937
2,122
Ohio
I think it’s way better to use the existing building and revitalize the downtown area. That’s always a better option than some far flung suburb.
In this specific case, they should tear it down and build new with the entertainment district, and play at Maverick center for 3 years. That rink is far better than playing at Mullet was. Hell, isn’t it only 3,000 seats shy of what MTS center was when Winnipeg first got the Thrashers?

I just don’t see how they can properly renovate the building to accommodate an ice rink without massive structural adjustments. This “new technology” Smith keeps talking about sounds like fantasy world.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Prarievarg

rt

Clean Hits on Substack
In this specific case, they should tear it down and build new with the entertainment district, and play at Maverick center for 3 years. That rink is far better than playing at Mullet was. Hell, isn’t it only 3,000 seats shy of what MTS center was when Winnipeg first got the Thrashers?

I just don’t see how they can properly renovate the building to accommodate an ice rink without massive structural adjustments. This “new technology” Smith keeps talking about sounds like fantasy world.
I suspect engineers must approve the plans. So it’ll be okay I guess.
 

Baby Doaner

Registered User
Mar 14, 2021
1,003
979
I think it’s way better to use the existing building and revitalize the downtown area. That’s always a better option than some far flung suburb.
If you e ever been to downtown SLC, it’s a pretty nasty place, as are most city downtowns. A suburb close by would be more ideal in this case.
 

TheLegend

Hardly Deactivated
Aug 30, 2009
37,504
30,264
Buzzing BoH
Yeah, that’s kinda what I’m saying. If they can manage to positively impact some civic pride downtown that would be excellent.

Phoenix has been trying to do it for over ten years. Stanton wanted to do it when the Coyotes lost their 15 year lease. Replace Footprint with a new arena on the site of the convention center and then repurpose Footprint.

But the trick is you have to have every single stakeholder in on it. Suns/Mercury, residents, politicians… etc.
 

rt

Clean Hits on Substack
The concept of making downtowns less awful feels like a good cause to me. Even if it’s motivated by self serving profit gains. I honestly don’t care. They’re going to take our taxes anyway and rip us off. We might as well get something nice out of it now and again. Civic pride, as I said. Anything that doesn’t just make things uglier and more apathetic seems vital at this low point in time.
 
  • Like
Reactions: kickback256

Jormungandr

Registered User
Aug 14, 2002
3,937
2,122
Ohio
The fact that they’re going to do some major demo and rebuilding entire sections from scratch has me a lot more comfortable than I currently am. The way the Delta is currently set up is more of an embarrassment than playing at Mullett ever was. I didn’t realize they had the folded up bleachers along the sides of the rink by the benches and penalty boxes until the rookie scrimmage. That place is a nightmare to watch a game.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Coyotedroppings

Headshot77

Bad Photoshopper
Feb 15, 2015
3,982
1,995
Pittsburgh
The fact that they’re going to do some major demo and rebuilding entire sections from scratch has me a lot more comfortable than I currently am. The way the Delta is currently set up is more of an embarrassment than playing at Mullett ever was. I didn’t realize they had the folded up bleachers along the sides of the rink by the benches and penalty boxes until the rookie scrimmage. That place is a nightmare to watch a game.
Disagree on Delta center being more of an embarrassment than Mullett. It doesn't matter how goofy the arena layout is, 16k total seats for hockey and 10k unobstructed is way better optically than 3,800 TOTAL seats. That's what an NHL team's practice facility should be sized.

Sounds like this deal is going to be a renovation like Key Arena in Seattle was a renovation. Essentially tearing the whole thing down in stages and rebuilding it on the fly. Fine by me.
 

Jormungandr

Registered User
Aug 14, 2002
3,937
2,122
Ohio
Disagree on Delta center being more of an embarrassment than Mullett. It doesn't matter how goofy the arena layout is, 16k total seats for hockey and 10k unobstructed is way better optically than 3,800 TOTAL seats. That's what an NHL team's practice facility should be sized.

Sounds like this deal is going to be a renovation like Key Arena in Seattle was a renovation. Essentially tearing the whole thing down in stages and rebuilding it on the fly. Fine by me.
Well, for one, you’re undershooting that 3800 TOTAL by 1000 seats. And I agree, that’s obviously not NHL standard. Never disputed that. The difference here is, one is a temporary facility. One is the permanent facility.

If this project at Delta fails to move forward for whatever reason, people around the league will start to say the same thing about Delta that they were saying about Mullett. “Joke”. “Embarrassment”. “Players deserve better”.

Hopefully this will ultimately end up like a Key arena situation like you say. I still have my doubts about the timeframe. They better hope the hockey team and the Jazz both miss the playoffs the next few seasons.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DustyDangler

No Fun Shogun

34-38-61-10-13-15
May 1, 2011
56,891
14,166
Illinois
Mullett was a temp facility for as long as it took Meruelo to build a new facility. In all likelihood, it would've taken even longer to get that done than this timeline given his total inability to get anything done, if even ever.

Delta from the get-go has more better seats than Mullett and an actual timetable for completion. In both avenues, that gives Delta a leg up on Mullett. Giving Delta major props will have to wait until we at least see some renderings of the designed final product.

I'm sure Mullett is a perfectly fine college arena, but once the small gimmick wore off it was an embarrassing NHL arena.
 
  • Like
Reactions: kickback256

Jormungandr

Registered User
Aug 14, 2002
3,937
2,122
Ohio
Mullett was a temp facility for as long as it took Meruelo to build a new facility. In all likelihood, it would've taken even longer to get that done than this timeline given his total inability to get anything done, if even ever.

Delta from the get-go has more better seats than Mullett and an actual timetable for completion. In both avenues, that gives Delta a leg up on Mullett. Giving Delta major props will have to wait until we at least see some renderings of the designed final product.

I'm sure Mullett is a perfectly fine college arena, but once the small gimmick wore off it was an embarrassing NHL arena.
There was a timeline for a new arena in Arizona at one point as well. Until there wasn’t. I get why they pulled the plug on Mullett. And I agree with it. It was a temp arena that was becoming more than temporary. My problem is Delta Center. Until they show that they can demo and construct the seating to better suit a hockey rink, I will always have my doubts. We’ve had renderings of an arena in Phoenix as well. Doesn’t mean they will come to fruition.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Coyotedroppings

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad