End of Line
John Price hater
- Mar 20, 2009
- 25,341
- 8,927
Pens trading Rob Scuderi to the Blackhawks for Trevor Daley in December 2015
nah..it was not just a pick!!!! The trade was a 2nd for Hutson...... lol I am just kidding, I agree with your assessment, no one knows who the Oilers would have drafted with that pick but it is debatable if Kulak is worth a secondPretty interesting idea for a topic, no idea why you choose this horrible example though.
For one, a draft pick is just that, a draft pick. It's not a player, it's not even the rights to a player yet. That Montreal ended up picking Hutson with that pick is thus entirely irrelevant. There is no reason to assume that Edmonton would have drafted Hutson with that pick. Not to mention that for every Hutson drafted in the second round, there are dozens of players who never amount to anything. Not that it really matters, because trading a future piece for something that might help you win now is the whole point of contenders trading at the deadline. You take the risk (not that a 2nd rounder is a risk to begin with) of losing out on something that could help you in the future to have a better chance at winning now. And if you end up winning a Cup, it doesn't matter one bit what you gave up, because you won the very thing you wanted to win. Now, Edmonton didn't succeed in that, but so did plenty of others who tried as well. If they are an example for anything, it's that having franchise players doesn't equal an automatic Cup-win.
Brett Kulak has delivered exactly as expected, and has regularly upped his game in the playoffs by quite a bit. He was easily worth the 2nd rounder (a pick, not Hutson, no matter how much you pretend otherwise) that was being traded for him. Being somewhat responsible for goals against one one game doesn't change anything about that. Players have bad games, it happens, regardless of point in time. Patrick Roy is famed for his playoff performances, yet that didn't stop him from sinking his team in the conference finals with his "statue of liberty" mistake and following 0-7 drubbing in the next game.
Kulak was very much worth his contract extension. On top of that, Broberg was neither better than Kulak (much less vastly superior) at any point of their time on the team together, nor did Kulak block Broberg from playing, otherwise you hardly would have seen Broberg in the last playoffs, no?
In no way, shape or from did Kulak prevent the Oilers from playing Broberg, or from re-signing him. As evidenced by the fact that the team cleared enough cap-space to spend millions on UFA-wingers last summer.
Management clearly botched things with Broberg, and Holloway as well for that matter But that has nothing whatsoever to do with Kulak. There was nothing bad about getting him, nor about keeping him. It was not remotely close to being "value bleeding" and it sure as heck couldn't be further from "franchise crippling". So no, your post is very much not "without exaggeration", it is indeed the exact opposite of that. It is about as exaggerated as it gets and completely detached from reality.
And looking at your over the top ranting, if the Oilers hadn't traded that pick for a defenseman they clearly needed, you probably would have whined about how management failed to do its utmost to improve the roster and thus wasted years of McDavid's and Draisaitl's prime.
Everyone knew that trade was ridiculous. Apparently, even Colaiacovo asked Toronto GM Cliff Fletcher who they were being traded for, and when Fletcher said “Stempniak,” Colaiacovo responded with, “And…?”There have been articles around the subject, so there’s better than what I’m typing for you if you want to go learn all the details:
Steen to stl meets your criteria.
He was not the primary trade demand in the initial transaction, then stuff happens, he becomes a core of our group, he wins a cup and now is about to be our gm.
Here is a top 10 video of steen moments
I only looked at the first page but this was my exact exampleRyan Smyth requested a trade in 2011 and the Kings sent him back to Edmonton in June of that year. The deal was originally in exchange for Gilbert Brule but that was scuttled because there was a disagreement over Brule’s health so the Oilers sent Colin Fraser back instead. If Smyth hadn’t done that the Kings would not have had the cap space to trade for Jeff Carter later that year without making another move. Colin Fraser ended up centering the Kings’ aggressive forechecking 4th line on their way to a Stanley Cup.
Detroit picking up Larry Murphy on waivers from Toronto in 1997. Or do you mean currently?
Speaking of waiver pick ups ... Martin St Louis. Flames picked Begin over him.
Feel like everything posted so far is like - "player not good actually was good" or "pick became good player" which is kinda boring. Are there any good examples of like a butterfly effect thing where a tiny domino turned into something much bigger down the road whether it be player or organizational impact?
That's correct. He was waived in favor of Begin, but ultimately signed as a UFA with the Bolts.Martin St. Louis was never claimed on waivers.
The Bruins legendary draft and you got the numbers wrong:fter picking 15th, 16th and 17th in the first round the Bruins
Kulak has been rock solid for the Oilers in the playoffs 3 years in a row, not sure why OP is clinging onto him not having a great gap on the game 7 gwg.The Kulak example is riddled with false equivalencies, half-truths and hyperbole.
However, the premise of the thread is interesting. I will submit the example that appeared most obvious to me when clicking on the thread.
Waiver pickup Gustav Forsling. I don't think I need to explain further.