@newdimension didn't post #350 of this thread include the updated heights and weights, prior to your edit last night?They're not out yet. They'll likely be released tomorrow.
@newdimension didn't post #350 of this thread include the updated heights and weights, prior to your edit last night?They're not out yet. They'll likely be released tomorrow.
He removed them because they were the pre-Combine measurements listed by NHL.com when they announced which guys would be invited to the Combine.@newdimension didn't post #350 of this thread include the updated heights and weights, prior to your edit last night?
Is there one place where all the heights and weights have been posted? Thanks in advance
thehockeywriters.com
The last thing I want is to be influenced by combine results into thinking a player is better than they are because they can kill it in the gym, or thinking a player is worse because they still have room to get stronger.
One got more nutrition in the womb, Liam works harder, Markus was sick recently....Oh, the thing posted earlier had them as:
MARKUS, RUCK (C, L) - 5' 11.75", 167 lbs | Birthdate: 21-Feb-08 | Team: MEDICINE HAT (WHL)
LIAM, RUCK (RW, R) - 5' 11.75", 177 lbs | Birthdate: 21-Feb-08 | Team: MEDICINE HAT (WHL)
Anyway, maybe I'm just irrationally fascinated with twins.
Like, imagine there was a second you? weird.
McKenna being essentially at the top of the combine class gives me pause; doesn't have the athletic runway some of these other prospects have.
He's unlikely to gain more of an edge in this area vs his peers, if anything they'll start catching up.
Shades of Lafreniere a bit here where his elite coaching program gave him an edge as a teen that won't translate to his 20's.
Anyway, maybe I'm just irrationally fascinated with twins.
Like, imagine there was a second you? weird.
McKenna being essentially at the top of the combine class gives me pause; doesn't have the athletic runway some of these other prospects have.
He's unlikely to gain more of an edge in this area vs his peers, if anything they'll start catching up.
Shades of Lafreniere a bit here where his elite coaching program gave him an edge as a teen that won't translate to his 20's.
I would argue he's the opposite of Laffreniere.McKenna being essentially at the top of the combine class gives me pause; doesn't have the athletic runway some of these other prospects have.
He's unlikely to gain more of an edge in this area vs his peers, if anything they'll start catching up.
Shades of Lafreniere a bit here where his elite coaching program gave him an edge as a teen that won't translate to his 20's.
I would argue he's the opposite of Laffreniere.
McKenna is scrawny/wiry with absolutely elite sense, hands and a near total unwillingness to engage physically . He is going to absolutely thrive on the PP when he has a little extra time and space. Lafreniere was a fully developed adult at 16 with insane off ice work habits and totally engaged physically, with nowhere close to elite raw talent/skill. his PP numbers career to date are abysmal. He just isn't that good.
The body of work is still massively underwhelming for a 1OA pick in his 6th NHL season.(Lafreniere had 1 less PP point this season than he did in every season of his career combined up to the most recent. Panarin being moved meant he got consistent PP1 mins for the first time in his career)
Parents favorite?The Ruck twin are the exact same height as expected, but how it one ten pounds heavier?
Surely that's a typo?

That narrative is a bit of a myth people made up to rationalize Lafreniere's struggles in the NHL.I would argue he's the opposite of Laffreniere.
McKenna is scrawny/wiry with absolutely elite sense, hands and a near total unwillingness to engage physically . He is going to absolutely thrive on the PP when he has a little extra time and space. Lafreniere was a fully developed adult at 16 with insane off ice work habits and totally engaged physically, with nowhere close to elite raw talent/skill. his PP numbers career to date are abysmal. He just isn't that good.
He was 6'1 and 200lbs at 16....with a ton of drive.That narrative is a bit of a myth people made up to rationalize Lafreniere's struggles in the NHL.
Junior Lafrenière had solid size, but he was never that big or that physical; IIRC he came into the draft listed at 6'1 - 195 pounds. Hell he wasn't even the most physical guy on his own junior line. People imagined he was a power-forward in the making because he threw a couple hits at the WJC, but that was never his game. The vast majority of the damage he did at the junior level was done through his hands and his play-making; he never dominated through physicality. And frankly, if there had been a Combine that year I doubt he would have done that well.
Lafrenière's actual issues aren't a lack of offensive talent. It's that he's a low-pace player with a mediocre first-step/acceleration. And probably a lack of drive too: it's the only way I can explain how little progress he's made in 6 years with the Rangers. Though he did play really well in 2026; I guess we'll see next year if he actually turned a corner.
That said I agree that he has little in common with McKenna.
Literally every high-end prospect gets that exact same kind of puff-piece, and they're always meaningless. Especially one with such glaring errors. 200 lbs!? You really think he was bigger at 16 than at the draft? Maybe if he was weighed after a week-long rampage at La Belle Province. But no, at 16 Lafreniere was listed a bit over 170. Which makes a lot more sense if you actually saw him play back then.He was 6'1 and 200lbs at 16....with a ton of drive.
Matthew Tkachuk is about the same size as Lafreniere and one of the worst skaters in the league. Yet he dominates the ozone because his sense is elite and so are his hands.
If your 1OA pick can't force his way onto PP1 in 6 NHL seasons, it speaks to an underlying issue (skill deficiency IMO).
![]()
‘He … emptied out my gym’: Inside top prospect Alexis Lafrenière’s garage workouts
What's a hot-shot NHL prospect to do when his world is in lockdown? Go hang out in the garage at his parents’ house.www.nytimes.com
they didn't have a combine for 2020Literally every high-end prospect gets that exact same kind of puff-piece, and they're always meaningless. Especially one with such glaring errors. 200 lbs!? You really think he was bigger at 16 than at the draft? Maybe if he was weighed after a week-long rampage at La Belle Province. But no, at 16 Lafreniere was listed a bit over 170. Which makes a lot more sense if you actually saw him play back then.
Matthew Tkachuk is more successful than Lafreniere not because he has better hands, but because he's 10x more aggressive, more competitive and harder-working. Lafrenière's hands are actually excellent; it's probably been his most consistently strong offensive tool. But both his feet and his decision-making are too slow to play the same kind of skill game at the NHL level that he played in juniors.
You don't need the combine to have weight/height measurements. Lafreniere was listed at 193 at the draft. Even in the NHL I don't think Lafreniere has ever been listed at 200lbs or more. It's far-fetched to think he was that size at 16. He was a slightly above-average sized junior, and now an average-sized NHLer. But he was never a physically-dominant power forward, at any level.they didn't have a combine for 2020
McKenna being essentially at the top of the combine class gives me pause; doesn't have the athletic runway some of these other prospects have.
He's unlikely to gain more of an edge in this area vs his peers, if anything they'll start catching up.
Shades of Lafreniere a bit here where his elite coaching program gave him an edge as a teen that won't translate to his 20's.
Grier (and kind of hilariously placed Stenberg) quote from nhl.com: McKenna among top performers in fitness testing at NHL Scouting Combine | NHL.comIf you really compare draft combine with a playoff game you are completely detached from reality, high on your "dig deep" trope. It's stupid.
I had 0 doubt that some of the cavemen in the NHL front offices agree with your line of thinking, if that's what your point is here.Grier (and kind of hilariously placed Stenberg) quote from nhl.com: McKenna among top performers in fitness testing at NHL Scouting Combine | NHL.com
"It's the competitiveness of it all," Grier said. "... Kind of how they're willing to kind of push themselves a little bit to get the last pull-up, or the Wingate when they're dead tired. Are they going to push through that last 10 seconds? So just try and see their competitiveness and their athleticism."
Ivar Stenberg, No. 1 on Central Scouting's final ranking of International skaters, declined to test because of an illness. The forward with Frolunda in the Swedish Hockey League said he hasn't been feeling well since completing play with Sweden at the 2026 IIHF World Championship on May 28.
"Been sick pretty much lately so after Worlds, I talked to my agents, my off-ice coach, and we decided that this is the best for me, and to not do it," Stenberg said. "It's going to maybe (not) look too good, but it's dangerous to do it when you're sick, so that's why."
"The cavemen"I had 0 doubt that some of the cavemen in the NHL front offices agree with your line of thinking, if that's what your point is here.
I especially enjoyed this part where you consider yourself to be the spokesman for "hockey fans as a whole". Lines up really well with your other views.That's what hockey fans as a whole celebrate and what the winners look for to admire and emulate