It really isn't:Yeah.
Correct call
Unless your interpretation of "serious injury" is a player literally dying on the ice, that's a f***ing green light for pests running into goalies. Just throw yourself into a goalie after a crosscheck, it won't be whistled down."In the case where it is obvious that a player has sustained a serious injury, the Referee and/or Linesperson may stop the play immediately."
Goalies should be different than players no?I believe the rule is that the refs aren’t supposed to blow the whistle for injury if the opposing team has possession. They’re supposed to let it play out.
Yes. And for obvious reasons it's this way.I believe the rule is that the refs aren’t supposed to blow the whistle for injury if the opposing team has possession. They’re supposed to let it play out.
Key word being "may", that leaves it up to the refs discretion. The Avs got screwed by the rules here, but nonetheless the rules were followed.It really isn't:
Unless your interpretation of "serious injury" is a player literally dying on the ice, that's a f***ing green light for pests running into goalies. Just throw yourself into a goalie after a crosscheck, it won't be whistled down.
And no, I'm not blaming the Buffalo player on this one, it was obviously just on Kelly of the Avs.
Goalies should be different than players no?
Not if it's your own teammate shoved the opposing player into youGoalies should be different than players no?
NHL refs followed the rulebook, so I guess that is an aberration. They are trying to correct it now by calling that ridiculous “trip” on Makar, where his leg apparently blew up after being tapped. It’s a damn shame, I was always told he was a good skater. Probably will have to be amputated with the way he reacted.Classic nhl reffing
NHL refs followed the rulebook, so I guess that is an aberration.