CutOnDime97
Instant Expert
- Mar 29, 2008
- 16,223
- 10,617
I don't think it's a bad trade, but as the details come out, it went from great (Laughton for '26 1st and Grebenkin) to not bad.For all the hype on a bidding war, we had to:
Get a pick TWO years away
Top 10 protected
Give up a 4th
Give up a 6th
Retain half the salary
Bad trade.
Kuzmenko is the 3rdIt is for basically a 4
It is for basically a 4th line center. A very good one but still. And retention this year doesn’t matter. It’s 1.5 next year. Then all the retention is gone…Hayes, Laughton and Deangelo. About 7 million. Next year. I think.
Yeah we definitely need more bottom 6 grinders.I'm actually excited for Grebenkin.
Spot on.2027?! I mean I’m not sobbing, but again, they turned down a draft day 1st a couple years ago from St. Louis. Now, this pick won’t have any impact until the 2030s. But the rebuild is also ending next season. That makes sense. No team cares less about time value of picks than the Flyers though, that’s for sure.
Three months away from being two years away.How's the 27 draft look?
Retaining is a prerequisite for a trade with a cap ceiling team like Toronto.I really dont think this is a horrible trade. Adding the picks and retaining is dumb but if we were the ones trading a 1st and a prospect we liked for Laughton we would be rioting
It is for basically a 4
It is for basically a 4th line center. A very good one but still. And retention this year doesn’t matter. It’s 1.5 next year. Then all the retention is gone…Hayes, Laughton and Cam… About 7 million. Next year. I think.
Appleyard likes him so that's good enough for me.I'm actually excited for Grebenkin.
No it’s cam. Kuzmenko done this year. 7 mill next year. Zero after that.Kuzmenko is the 3rd