Regardless of value, Blues can't do that unless they create a couple million in cap space elsewhere.Myers 1m retained for Scandella.
Regardless of value, Blues can't do that unless they create a couple million in cap space elsewhere.Myers 1m retained for Scandella.
We can help accomodate this.Regardless of value, Blues can't do that unless they create a couple million in cap space elsewhere.
ACtually... never mind. Blues have like zero bad contracts. Not even any replacement level players being paid 2m or something. Unfortunate.We can help accomodate this.
If Blues want to create space to add someone, dealing Tarasenko feels like path of least resistance.ACtually... never mind. Blues have like zero bad contracts. Not even any replacement level players being paid 2m or something. Unfortunate.
I think the best fit for Tarasenko is New Jersey, but not sure if they would be willing to do that at this point in their rebuild. Or if they even having anything that would interest the Blues.If Blues want to create space to add someone, dealing Tarasenko feels like path of least resistance.
Agree that Jersey could make sense. If they would take him at full $, I could see Blues willing to take picks/prospects for him and then going shopping elsewhere (presumably for a D).I think the best fit for Tarasenko is New Jersey, but not sure if they would be willing to do that at this point in their rebuild. Or if they even having anything that would interest the Blues.
this feels like an offseason dealAgree that Jersey could make sense. If they would take him at full $, I could see Blues willing to take picks/prospects for him and then going shopping elsewhere (presumably for a D).
kinda defeats the purpose. one, there's more than 1m diff in cap hits. the blues couldn't afford thatMyers 1m retained for Scandella.
Maybe Myers straight up for Scandella if Canucks retain difference in salary. No way Blues would pay Sunny to be stuck with Myers terrible contract.
the Blues are not giving Sunny away to trade Scandella. nor should theyI think Myers is the better player but their values might be similar because Myers costs almost double.
Wouldn't retain but would do straight up, but I understand you don't want that salary either. That's why I added Sundqvist because he evens up the cap and fills a major hole for us. Canucks could add a pick but probably not a high enough one for you to change your mind.
Canucks do need LD help/depth but not @ Scandella's cap price.
Isn't he a much worse version of Scandella?
No enough to be worth it.Pretty much.
But… you save cap?
the Blues are not giving Sunny away to trade Scandella. nor should they
Okay, okay. Let's think this through. Tyler Myers, 31 yrs old RD, 2 more years on his contract at 6m. So, we are going to take on that contract to play him on the third pairing behind Parayko and Faulk, and invest almost 20m in three RD? Even with retention, this makes no sense whatsoever. Why don't we just extend Bortuzzo, who has been playing very well lately, (and can PK!), for about half that?
no worries at all.. but peeps said STL would have to pay to get rid of Allen last year too.. will be interesting to see what shakes outLike I get it but it's not like someone out there is going to take Scandella for free.
Unrealistic trade anyway, just brainstorming, as we do here.
Sorry, didn't mean to rain on your parade. I enjoy reading trade ideas too. My post probably sounded a little heavy handed.Like I get it but it's not like someone out there is going to take Scandella for free.
Unrealistic trade anyway, just brainstorming, as we do here.
No enough to be worth it.