Save percentage over time

[JD1]

There was some discussion in the past few days about goalie save percentages and how the average is now around .900

Interesting discussion about east west play being harder for goalies to track and basically being harder on their bodies which is why we don't see guys starting 60+ anymore

Death of the .900 save percentage: Why stopping the puck is so tough for today’s NHL goalies

Save percentage is on track to finish at a 29-year low. What has changed for the masked men?

www.dailyfaceoff.com

Click to read more...

 

[Tuna99]

Ottawa won’t make the playoffs unless both goalies play way better. They have both been bad this year, cost the team points, and the play of both goalies has kept us stuck in the mud

no line combos, veteran leadership. call ups, bad pinches, face off percentage, power play goals, penalty kill efficiency will matter unless the goalies start acting like reliable goalies

Ottawa is going nowhere if these goalies keep this up. It’s really that simple

 

[Xspyrit]

Interesting, yes it has to be kept in mind by fans when discussing goaltending. Hockey is a sport constantly in movement, things happen, things change and statistics are going to vary

 

[Boud]

To be fair I think Forsberg has done his job. He’s a backup and we need to expect backup goaltending from him. Some bad games early on but generally this season he’s been good enough to come in relief of Ullmark.

The problem is Ullmark is not playing like a starter and we acquired him and paid him to be just that. A starter is supposed to give you a chance to win 95% of the time and he just hasn’t been that guy for us.

Happy with Forsberg so far. He looks a lot better than last year. He looks calmer in net, stops the play, in good position majority of the time.

 

[Norris4Norris]

Forsberg has a .903 save percentage which I think is respectable for a backup.

Ullmark has an .890 save percentage which is a steep drop off from years before and one of the worst in the league.

Stolarz for the leafs has a .927 save percentage.

Ullmark might not be the goaltender we all thought he would be. Still time, but good thing it was only a 2 year contract

 

[KingAlfie11]

Ullmark might not be the goaltender we all thought he would be. Still time, but good thing it was only a 2 year contract

Linus Ullmark has consistently proven himself as a top goaltender in the league, maintaining a save percentage of 900 in every season he's played. Such performance doesn't deteriorate overnight. With his solid track record, there's little reason to worry about his capabilities.

 

[Norris4Norris]

Linus Ullmark has consistently proven himself as a top goaltender in the league, maintaining a save percentage of 900 in every season he's played. Such performance doesn't deteriorate overnight. With his solid track record, there's little reason to worry about his capabilities.

I hope you are right.

Matt Murray was a two time Stanley Cup champion. When he came over I thought it would be a golden era.

 

[OD99]

I hope you are right.

Matt Murray was a two time Stanley Cup champion. When he came over I thought it would be a golden era.

He was broken by the time we acquired him.

It's very odd how both Ullmark and Swayman are struggling this year.

 

[Norris4Norris]

He was broken by the time we acquired him.

It's very odd how both Ullmark and Swayman are struggling this year.

Yes, I thought that when we played Boston. Was it the team defence of Boston from previous years that helped prop up the goalies.

It is not like the sens are playing badly in front of Ullmark. The possession time has been much better this year, which has helped fuel a top 5 offence.

Maybe Ullmark got paid just after his prime, yeesh. Sounds like something an Ottawa GM would do.

 

[frightenedinmatenum2]

Yes, basic stats need league wide averages to be taken into account. We are now at a point where a .900 goalie is a good goalie and an .890 goalie is still an NHLer.

With that said, there are more factors at player. Consistency might be just as important as overall performance. You don't want a goalie with with massive peaks and valleys. Backup or number two goalies also usually get the easier games, so they should have a bit of a boost to their save percentage compared to the starter who is getting the top teams.

It goes both ways. People get hyped about a player being PPG, but PPG players are now what 65 point players used to be in terms of how common they are.

 

[KingAlfie11]

It's very odd how both Ullmark and Swayman are struggling this year.

Yes, and it's a different situation when you're designated as the #1 goaltender. In previous seasons, they operated as a tandem and were both comfortable with that arrangement. It will take some time for each to adjust to the role and responsibilities of being the #1 goaltender.

 

[KingAlfie11]

Maybe Ullmark got paid just after his prime, yeesh. Sounds like something an Ottawa GM would do

It's unreasonable to expect a General Manager to predict a goaltender's future performance; they don't possess a crystal ball for foresight. Linus Ullmark remains an elite goaltender, and the current uproar is simply an overreaction.

 

[PlayersLtd]

I hope you are right.

Matt Murray was a two time Stanley Cup champion. When he came over I thought it would be a golden era.

How could you possibly compare the two? You were the only person thinking Matt Murray was going to usher in a golden era.

As others have pointed out, Linus has shown far more consistency and is entering his prime especially so if you measure up his progression. Even if he maintains a .890 save % all season you shouldn't panic. Goalies' careers are defined by ups and downs, it's the nature of the position. One season does not change the innate talent that the good one's possess. Likewise one season (or stretch) does not make a mediocre goalie a star (Stolarz, Skinner, Montembeault, Silovs, Blackwood, Lyon etc...). Something about voodoo...

Also worth noting, Swayman's numbers are absolutely atrocious.