Our defense is really bad, and with out Matthews and Nylander playing extraordinary hockey we could easily be 0-3. Not sure what the fix is here tbh. Most of the d just looks so ugly.
Yes, if we have to trade someone, the only one actually tradable at the moment is Willy, thanks to Dubas giving NTCs to Matty, Mitch and JT.My point was there has been discussion on whether or not they can afford to keep the core four together and if Treliving decides the answer to that question is "no" - then which of the four would be the most likely to go and that's where I believe the "word on the street" is Nylander. If it were my decision I would rather trade Tavaras than Nylander but apparently trading Tavaras is a non-starter.
OK - gotcha. My opinion on him is out of date.
Yes, if we have to trade someone, the only one actually tradable at the moment is Willy, thanks to Dubas giving NTCs to Matty, Mitch and JT.
But Willy wants to stay, and trading him or letting him walk would be the worst move.
Every single player of those statures has a NTC or NMC, so not really sure why the need for a piss poor take.Yes, if we have to trade someone, the only one actually tradable at the moment is Willy, thanks to Dubas giving NTCs to Matty, Mitch and JT.
But Willy wants to stay, and trading him or letting him walk would be the worst move.
It’s just hockey I don’t understand why you can’t just say poor take. Instead you always take it to another level like piss poor take. I like seeing your posts but you always go to an extreme.Every single player of those statures has a NTC or NMC, so not really sure why the need for a piss poor take.
Why is it a "piss poor take" to point out the facts?Every single player of those statures has a NTC or NMC, so not really sure why the need for a piss poor take.