Its not your fault
Registered User
- Nov 24, 2016
- 1,929
- 543
What makes you think he wouldn't fall in line with those digits?Our entire 4th line combined is pacing for less than 15/30 though.
What makes you think he wouldn't fall in line with those digits?Our entire 4th line combined is pacing for less than 15/30 though.
So after a hot start he has basically put up the type of production he put up in Chicago (without the benefit of playing with sniper Dickinson). He’s now averaging less than 10 minutes a game and not winning face offs either. He wasn’t exactly great in the playoffs for Toronto either. Any concerns here? Do we need an upgrade?
It’s laffable this thread still exists.This is still going?
I don’t know whether to Laff or cry.
I will show myself out…..
It’s laffable this thread still exists.
Tell me you're a Dubist without saying you're a Dubist lol.I’m the opposite, I think it’s great we have receipts for all those posters losing their collective minds over Sam Lafferty early on this year
Someone should make a montage.
he was and always has been a meh 4th liner who's cheap filler until you can find someone betterSo after a hot start he has basically put up the type of production he put up in Chicago (without the benefit of playing with sniper Dickinson). He’s now averaging less than 10 minutes a game and not winning face offs either. He wasn’t exactly great in the playoffs for Toronto either. Any concerns here? Do we need an upgrade?
I always preferred Engvall over this dude. At least Engvall could provide 15 - 18 goals while being dependable defensively. Lafferty didn't stand out when he was here but he had a few good moments.