NotAVacuumSalesman
The Guide And Record Book™
- Jun 19, 2017
- 4,248
- 7,720
If it weren’t for covid we would’ve been at $100 million or surpassed it.Just make it $100 million.
The flat cap at $81.5 million lasted for 3 seasons.
If it weren’t for covid we would’ve been at $100 million or surpassed it.Just make it $100 million.
Draisaitl deal looks pretty good
The McDavid contract might be eye popping
No it didn’t, it was limited to 1 million increases.If it weren’t for covid we would’ve been at $100 million or surpassed it.
The flat cap at $81.5 million lasted for 3 seasons.
Just make it $100 million.
According to wiki it stayed flat for three seasons.No it didn’t, it was limited to 1 million increases.
If the total revenues are in the $6.2-6.5B range this year, and they may be more, escrow should not be an issue even at $97M. Assuming even a 4% rise the players share should be in the range of $95-100M per team even on the low end of that range.Players would be smart to leave it at 5% growth so they don’t wind up with high escrow payments. Worst case every player gets cut a check at season end to make up and shortfall on the players share.
The League and the NHLPA can agree to more. The increase this year was 5.4%.I thought 5% was the max it could rise
Ahh ok looks like it was both,
50% of which must go to the players...It makes sense. I think the projections were always way too conservative on the cap growth given revenues. I’m not sure how you tell your workforce to stay satisfied with meager growth or complain about how much players are making when the owners are taking in incredible revenues and team valuations are skyrocketing towards $2 billion for an average team.
I thought 5% was the max it could rise
Both???Ahh ok looks like it was both,