Jay R
Registered User
- Mar 30, 2024
- 64
- 29
Never intent with the Saginaw players it's never their fault lolNo intent on Dionicio, he threw the top half of the broken stick into the boards and it bounced off in the direction of the ref.
Never intent with the Saginaw players it's never their fault lolNo intent on Dionicio, he threw the top half of the broken stick into the boards and it bounced off in the direction of the ref.
Do you have eyes???? Go watch the OHL replay, if you can navigate your way to it... He clearly threw his broken stick into the boards and it bounced off, towards the ref. Now ,I do not know what was said, but the actual act was not a stick thrown at the ref.Never intent with the Saginaw players it's never their fault lol
If it went towards the ref they don't care they'll say he was attempting to throw it in that direction. On another note why the lengthy delay on the Guo suspension announcementDo you have eyes???? Go watch the OHL replay, if you can navigate your way to it... He clearly threw his broken stick into the boards and it bounced off, towards the ref. Now ,I do not know what was said, but the actual act was not a stick thrown at the ref.
The game misconduct was called when he picked his broken shaft up and skated to the official at the penalty box area and tossed his stick to the ice at the feet of the official there. That is when he made the call of a game misconductDo you have eyes???? Go watch the OHL replay, if you can navigate your way to it... He clearly threw his broken stick into the boards and it bounced off, towards the ref. Now ,I do not know what was said, but the actual act was not a stick thrown at the ref.
Because it will be crazy punitive, as it should be. There is no need to rush it. I'm sure the Spirit have been told to not expect him the rest of the OHL playoffs ++. No need to rush a decision if that much is known.If it went towards the ref they don't care they'll say he was attempting to throw it in that direction. On another note why the lengthy delay on the Guo suspension announcement
I agree what I saw was BS and nothing but the OHL well who knows?Do you have eyes???? Go watch the OHL replay, if you can navigate your way to it... He clearly threw his broken stick into the boards and it bounced off, towards the ref. Now ,I do not know what was said, but the actual act was not a stick thrown at the ref.
So if I do not mean to trip someone it is not a trip? If I did not intend to highstick you then it should not be a highsticking penalty? I did not mean to kick the puck in so it should be a goal? I did not mean to go offside so the goal stands?I agree what I saw was BS and nothing but the OHL well who knows?
The replay I viewed I didn't see it hit him in the leg? If it hit him in the leg then I retract the BS part of my comment.Whether you meant to or not a stick you threw hit the ref in the leg.
If it's an automatic 2, then it can be bought back. Daddy or no daddyIt was listed as an abuse of official penalty on the official score sheet. This penalty garners an automatic 2 game suspension no matter if it is a 2, 5 or a 10.
We will see what happens though since Daddy Hache is in charge of handing those things out...
Then why didn’t we buy back Hache’s auto 2 for his slew foot?If it's an automatic 2, then it can be bought back. Daddy or no daddy
I think there are certain suspensions that can't be bought back as for which one I have no clueThen why didn’t we buy back Hache’s auto 2 for his slew foot?
To much grey area in what constitutes a buy back penalty. If we can do it with Dionicio that’s a no brainer and why we didn’t buy back Hache makes no sense.I think there are certain suspensions that can't be bought back as for which one I have no clue
Because that's not one that could be bought backThen why didn’t we buy back Hache’s auto 2 for his slew foot?
I mean yes I get that. My question was more which automatic ones can be bought back and which can’t?Because that's not one that could be bought back
My understanding of the rule is that only automatic suspensions can be bought back. The stick incident should be considered a Category 3 that comes with an automatic 3 game suspension. I can't see anything in the OHL rule book that states a slew foot is an automatic 2 games. Anything requiring a review cannot be bought back, which I believe would encompass the slew footI mean yes I get that. My question was more which automatic ones can be bought back and which can’t?
Carson Harmer making his debut in the western conference finals. Listed on the 4th line.
Trust me this is not the team (London Knights) the OHL wants to win this year! Just check in on the Lawrence suspension from the past round. A message was being sent on behalf of the league to the Knights.well. This series is over. Refs have decided who will win.