I'm also anti-lottery, as mentioned. I feel it creates more problems than it solves and runs counter to the entire notion of why we have draft orders in the first place. That's not to say I like the idea of tanking, either, so if you say (or talk me into the fact) a lottery is simply necessary or a foregone reality, then the system has to be fixed. As it stands now, it's grossly and comically unfair, and obviously so IMO, irrespective of its impact on the Sabres. And fairness should be the standard we're striving for, not drama (or faux outrage at tanking).
I realize no system will ever be perfect and you'll always have complaints, but the system as it stands right now is so blatantly ridiculous it's a joke (the idea mentioned above that Chicago could win and land Dahlin makes me physically ill...and I'm not at all anti-Chicago). I'd definitely be interested in this tiered system, for example. But clearly the powers that be operate on another plane of reality from me because they seem to love things like this lottery and the off-sides coach's challenge, both of which are so obviously absurd (IMO, and for different reasons) my feeble brain can't comprehend how everyone else isn't outraged. But when the system gives the big boys (Chicago, NYR, Habs...) a shot at a 1-3 pick because the poor wittle things just missed the pwayoffs (ahhhh, shucks wittle fellas, here's a cookie), then I guess the whole thing almost validates itself in their eyes. Heck, I'd be thrilled too if we were just missing the playoffs and had a shot at 1-3 even though we don't really deserve it. It may thrill the near-miss teams, and probably the casual fan who loves the drama, but none of that makes it fair. Let's have John Paul Stevens editorialize on that! (Okay, that's getting carried away--he's probably a Caps fan.)