BowieSabresFan
Registered User
- Nov 18, 2010
- 4,432
- 1,770
They seem to invent ways to lose games. I’ve never seen anything like it.
because you loose it, then are shorthandedWhy not challenge instead? Much better use.
Because you have a better chance of overturning the goal than pulling the goalie.play was aided by Samuellson, why get a penalty
One outcome is worth 1.5 points, the other 0. If you think it's 50-50 you should make the challenge.because you loose it, then are shorthanded
Ruff had a zero chance of winning. The video clearly showed Samuelson with the push.Because you have a better chance of overturning the goal than pulling the goalie.
How often does that work? 2% of the time?
You could have stopped at "history".And the Sabres also continue to be the worst team in NHL history at 6 on 5.
I believe it's 1 minute or OT.Can Lindy have even challenged that call? Isn't there a rule that coaches can't challenge goals inside a certain time left in the game? Like....2 minutes?
If the review judge is sympathetic and the Boston player swept the leg maybe it gets overturned.One outcome is worth 1.5 points, the other 0. If you think it's 50-50 you should make the challenge.
To me it looked like the bruins player put his leg out to catch Reimer. Push or no push.Ruff had a zero chance of winning. The video clearly showed Samuelson with the push.
Yeah, I couldn't remember if it was 1 minute or two. I knew it was a thing in OT.I believe it's 1 minute or OT.
Everyone has said Samuellson caused itOne outcome is worth 1.5 points, the other 0. If you think it's 50-50 you should make the challenge.