NOTENOUGHRYANTHINGS
Registered User
- Oct 23, 2022
- 2,737
- 5,657
Crazy to think McDavid could have been instead drafted by Buffalo... and in most other years, Eichel isn't just a "consolation prize"-level talent.Kind of reminds you of what Edmonton went through pre-McDavid.
Might want to zoom out a bit and make sure the city of Buffalo itself isn't the issue. It's not just the Sabres feeling pain.
Must be a zoomer or have a short memory. The Sabres were one of the most consistently good teams in the league since their inception until the recent terribleness. They were like 4th in the entire league in winning percentage over that 40ish year span. "Mediocre to bad" for "basically their entire existence". What does that say about the 26 franchises that were below them in winning percentage most of that existence?if it wasn’t a viable market i’d imagine they’d have moved a long time ago considering how mediocre to bad the team has been for basically their entire existence. it’s clearly a viable market. they just arent good.
Man, they were damn near unbeatable in NHL ‘94.Must be a zoomer or have a short memory. The Sabres were one of the most consistently good teams in the league since their inception until the recent terribleness. They were like 4th in the entire league in winning percentage over that 40ish year span. "Mediocre to bad" for "basically their entire existence". What does that say about the 26 franchises that were below them in winning percentage most of that existence?
Must be a zoomer or have a short memory. The Sabres were one of the most consistently good teams in the league since their inception until the recent terribleness. They were like 4th in the entire league in winning percentage over that 40ish year span. "Mediocre to bad" for "basically their entire existence". What does that say about the 26 franchises that were below them in winning percentage most of that existence?
Sisyphus will get the boulder to the top of the hill before either happens.What's first. Buffalo makes PO or Leafs win a cup?
Because he had a statistical fact?good to know sabres fans are as annoying as bills fans lol
That's not true lolgood to know sabres fans are as annoying as bills fans lol
Yeah the Bills and Bandits are terrible....Might want to zoom out a bit and make sure the city of Buffalo itself isn't the issue. It's not just the Sabres feeling pain.
A TB12 avatar, so I’ll assume a Pats fan.good to know sabres fans are as annoying as bills fans lol
Well... I mean, it's more like "mediocre to pretty good." Thus a long time be pretty good but very few stints of being "really good" and even fewer, if any, of being great. Those Hasek teams were kind of a one-man show. At least as much as a team can be a one-man-goalie-show.Must be a zoomer or have a short memory. The Sabres were one of the most consistently good teams in the league since their inception until the recent terribleness. They were like 4th in the entire league in winning percentage over that 40ish year span. "Mediocre to bad" for "basically their entire existence". What does that say about the 26 franchises that were below them in winning percentage most of that existence?
Hang in there Sabres fans. It's gotta get better at some point. And when you eventually win that cup, it'll be that much sweeter
We've got some great TALENT -- but the problem is....a lot of that talent is utterly redundant. Somewhat smallish, skilled, not really physical/gritty.....shoot well. Some of them have questionable hockey IQ. FEW of them have any sort of defensive awareness/ability.I just don’t understand how they’re not better. They collected some great talent over the years.
True they had Eichel. But they could get another 1C (maybe?) by trading one of their two #1D?Honestly, looking at the lineup, the real issue is they don't have that clear number 1 calibre center.
If only they had drafted one of those players and kept them around.
Cool, but thats not what the discussion was about. It was about a misinformed person saying the team has been bad for its entire existence. It's just not true.Well... I mean, it's more like "mediocre to pretty good." Thus a long time be pretty good but very few stints of being "really good" and even fewer, if any, of being great. Those Hasek teams were kind of a one-man show. At least as much as a team can be a one-man-goalie-show.
Canadian teams used to have the problem of never being all-out bad, which meant they could never get great. It's still a problem, but less so. Buffalo, of course, has been just BAD at times. And I mean, they got really unlucky in the McDavid draft. Not that Eichel wasn't/isn't a great player, but it's hard to argue McDavid wouldn't have been better at turning the franchise around. Edmonton went through a very similar wilderness of rebuilds before McDavid came around.
You could also just say you were misinformed/wrong and admit your mistakes, but I suppose this is a reaction as well.good to know sabres fans are as annoying as bills fans lol