Old Navy Goat
Registered User
He phrased it wrong, should of wrote it as Point + Cernak + Hagel or Paul
I hear ya but it's hard enough to hit on a pick. Once you limit your options, you lower the probability.I got scolded by Zman for saying draft a defenseman and its not right if you don't take best player available. That being said if Reinbacher and ASP are off the board there is no defenseman worthy of the 13 pick. I would rather trade for a defenseman in the 23-25 year old range that fits in
I think he's saying Point + Hagel/Paul + cernak. 3 players, you pick one of the middle 2Hold up, am I reading this wrong or are you saying you “probably” would trade Tage for Nick Paul and Erik Cernak?!?
Or is it a Point + (Hagel or [Paul & Cernak]) which makes more sense lol
I understand your point. I think where we disagree is in our value of Casey. I think if Mitts played on the top line all year, he'd have a similar number of points as Tage ended up with, albeit with fewer explosions of 4-5 points. He seemed to be that consistent 1-2 point per night player when playing with elite talent, and far less streaky
I agree we need elite offensive talent. I just feel Mitts is that level, just not in a flashy way as is Tage
Maybe put a thread in the trade forum and see what other fans sayI really thought Noah Warren had potential to be right side Samuelsson. Too early to write off the Leinonen I guess, but I'd feel really good about the future of our D if we had gone in that direction last year.
While we definitely need some guys, I feel like Leinonen is what happens when you force a pick by position. We can trade for defensive prospects, just can't miss the value at the draft while hunting for specfic positions especially if this is a forward heavy draft in round 1.
I wonder what the best current NHL defenseman we could get with the 13th pick
He phrased it wrong, should of wrote it as Point + Cernak + Hagel or Paul
Anyone scared that we will trade away good players soon just to get rid of salary?
A reason for Adams inaction could be $ and an internal cap below the cap floor could be hard for him to stay under. Okposo's deal expiring saves us some at least.
My big worry is for this team to be killed by the owner's 180 on spending.
I was thinking more along the lines if our internal cap is around 60-65 million to save Pegula-bucks.No. Any trades that may happen is because they think it will make the team better. We’re not in cap dump territory yet. We’re barely in to players wanting to be on Buffalo, let alone getting rid of them
I don't think that should be a concern. T. Pegula and everyone down through the front office know that they have to ice a quality product to fill the barn. Playing exciting (and cheap) young players is a budget way to get fans back, but trading away those players (which the fan base has grown to love) to avoid paying them would drive fans away and destroy the positive feelings this team is starting to produce.I was thinking more along the lines if our internal cap is around 60-65 million to save Pegula-bucks.
I'm just trying to come up with ways for the Sabres to go full Sabres on us again.
Anyone scared that we will trade away good players soon just to get rid of salary?
A reason for Adams inaction could be $ and an internal cap below the cap floor could be hard for him to stay under. Okposo's deal expiring saves us some at least.
My big worry is for this team to be killed by the owner's 180 on spending.
Anyone scared that we will trade away good players soon just to get rid of salary?
A reason for Adams inaction could be $ and an internal cap below the cap floor could be hard for him to stay under. Okposo's deal expiring saves us some at least.
My big worry is for this team to be killed by the owner's 180 on spending.
That forum can be hit or miss, but its probably worth it for this one since there's likely a good number of fans who are interested in seeing whats available. I'm just bracing myself for the offers of bottom pairing guys with 1 year of ok analytics.Maybe put a thread in the trade forum and see what other fans say
Kane is toastWe couldn’t have waited until the second page to break the thread?
I’m excited for this off-season. The needs are obvious (top 4 defenseman, goalie to secure the net with Levi, a two way, physical forward. And we are still loaded with prospects, so I think Adams could go big game hunting and get a a skilled winger to play with Tage.
I’m going to annoy everyone, but it’s time. Pat Kane on a one or two year deal to play with Tage and finish out his career. It actually finally makes sense.
Looking at maybe Tom Wilson as possibly being available. He has one year left on his deal, but would change the shape of this lineup. Imagine him opening up the ice for Pat Kane and Thompson to work their magic. Drool. Would probably cost a pretty penny, but we have the ammo.
For top 4 defenseman to play with Power, I’m looking at the Blues. Nick Leddy? Justin Faulk? To get this type of lineup, we’d have to be willing to part with some premium assets, but I think this team would be able to challenge anyone.
We could roll out something like this:
Skinner - Mitts - Tuch
Kane? - Thompson - Tom Wilson?
Peterka - Cozens - Quinn
Greenway - Krebs - Kulich? Rousek?
Dahlin - Sammy
Power - (insert Blues defensemen here)
Boosh - Joker
Stillman
Levi
I’m not going to try to guess the other goalie.
Anyway, that was my day dream this morning. Feel free to tell me I’m a dumb ass.
not sure this draft is the best to start, at least in the 1st; its a weak D draftAs someone mentioned in the next 2 drafts our 1st round selections (if they aren't traded) better be defenseman. KA needs to replenish our pipeline with defenseman!
as @dortt said something in the lines that players are commodities which is true but team chemistry issues are not foreseeable and why tinker with that and maybe destroy something you build over the last few years.Mitts is quite possibly the Sabres most skilled player outside of Dahlin, but he is physically unable to impose his will like Tage can. Saying that, there's few players in the league that can, so you don't trade a unicorn for a dollar's worth of quarters