Yeah, I certainly got the sense that he was saying, both, that he hamstrung the roster a bit with this defense corps and that the team should still be better than it is. But in acknowledging that his roster is at least part of the problem, he probably doesn't feel it's appropriate to fire the coach at this time. But he's going to improve the blueline and results must follow - or else.
Absent a death spiral these last 18 games, it's pretty safe to assume that Bylsma starts next season as the head coach.
as much as i critize Bylsma i think its best for him to start next season. It would be too telling if he was let go coming out a rebuild. I hate his pair lineups and reinhart playing wing but i also relize this roster has been pretty banged up all season. Lets see whats on store for next season.Yeah, I certainly got the sense that he was saying, both, that he hamstrung the roster a bit with this defense corps and that the team should still be better than it is. But in acknowledging that his roster is at least part of the problem, he probably doesn't feel it's appropriate to fire the coach at this time. But he's going to improve the blueline and results must follow - or else.
Absent a death spiral these last 18 games, it's pretty safe to assume that Bylsma starts next season as the head coach.
I have no problems with Murray with the trades he made or the Okposo signing. For me, the Moulson and Ennis contracts are the ones that are hamstringing this team. Maybe he can dump one of them this offseason.
I still think the Pittsburgh crew that surrounds Pegula were the main drivers of the Bylsma signing.
They put a system in place for both the Sabres and Amerks and both teams have underachieved related to roster. The passivity when they have a lead is so frustrating and may have ultimately cost them a playoff spot this year. The 5 year contract makes it more difficult to see Bylsma canned this year. If it was a 3 year deal and they were only eating the final year then I could see it happening but not with 3 years to go when the injuries card can be played for this season's wows.
The need is for a top young NHL dman and if ever there was a time where a couple may be available it will be this summer with the expansion draft and a flat cap.
If Murray can grab that needed dman and somehow shed a couple of Ennis, Gorges, Moulson and give this team a little more flexibility as well as opening up a couple spots up front for the kids then that is a successful offseason in my books. Next year is a playoffs or bust season.
For me, my view of Tim is largely based on what he chooses to do with Dan this off-season. I still believe the roster is better than what they've shown for the majority of this year, and I want to see them under a new coach. If Tim makes some moves to improve the defense and brings in a new head coach, I'll still support him. If he chooses to go into next season with Dan still behind the bench he's going to start losing my support.
From listening to Murray last night it sounds like he feels not getting the D this team needed is on him. My take is that Murray brings in some D during the offseason and if the team is still in the same place in the standings he will fire Bylsma at some point during the season next year.
I'm guessing it went something like, "If I see anybody coasting for this final stretch of the season, I'm buying them a one-way ticket to Las Vegas. Anybody want to play on a first year expansion team? Didn't think so..."
I'm watching the Toronto Marlies, they lost all their 'A' prospects to the Leafs this year and they're still playing exciting offensive hockey and will make the playoffs while the Amerks have star AHL vets like Cal O'Reilly and Cole Schneider, prospects like Bailey, Baptiste, Rodrigues, Nylander and Fasching and they totally suck.
I would really give Sheldon Keefe some serious consideration when we are hiring the next Sabres coach. He's from Tim Murray's neck of the woods, Ottawa area, I wonder if he's on Tim's radar.
I have no problems with Murray with the trades he made or the Okposo signing. For me, the Moulson and Ennis contracts are the ones that are hamstringing this team. Maybe he can dump one of them this offseason.
I still think the Pittsburgh crew that surrounds Pegula were the main drivers of the Bylsma signing.
They put a system in place for both the Sabres and Amerks and both teams have underachieved related to roster. The passivity when they have a lead is so frustrating and may have ultimately cost them a playoff spot this year. The 5 year contract makes it more difficult to see Bylsma canned this year. If it was a 3 year deal and they were only eating the final year then I could see it happening but not with 3 years to go when the injuries card can be played for this season's wows.
The need is for a top young NHL dman and if ever there was a time where a couple may be available it will be this summer with the expansion draft and a flat cap.
If Murray can grab that needed dman and somehow shed a couple of Ennis, Gorges, Moulson and give this team a little more flexibility as well as opening up a couple spots up front for the kids then that is a successful offseason in my books. Next year is a playoffs or bust season.
this ******* idiot coach is gonna ruin ROR's life. Throw him right out there all game long...not like he needs any rest at all....
this ******* idiot coach is gonna ruin ROR's life. Throw him right out there all game long...not like he needs any rest at all....
Not really trying to argue this because well.... it's Blysma we are talking about....
But I never met a player who responded "Coach, take it easy on me, I'm kinda tired..."
So what I am getting at is that players are the last ones to recognize their own deficiencies and I'm pretty sure RoR loves every second of ice time he's being given (and thinks it makes him a stronger rather than weaker player....)
And nobody rested Gretzky much either..... (Wayne was a machine....) Maybe Disco has the jersey numbers confused (99 vs 90)?
![]()
What are you whining about? He played like 19:30 in regulation, which is about two minutes below his average and hardly remarkable for a 1st line player. Then he played special teams, standing in one zone or the other, for overtime. Gonna whine about Jack's ice time, too, seeing as how he played two seconds more than ROR?
What are you whining about? He played like 19:30 in regulation, which is about two minutes below his average and hardly remarkable for a 1st line player. Then he played special teams, standing in one zone or the other, for overtime. Gonna whine about Jack's ice time, too, seeing as how he played two seconds more than ROR?
Listen, in general the guy has a good point. Too much ice for the guy, plain and simple. Girgensons can take faceoffs I think? Not that I want to go back in time, but one thing I can say with 100% certainty is that Ruff did a better job getting everyone involved in the game.
I don't care how much money you make, who GMTM signed, blah blah whatever whatever, you need to get more guys involved.
Girgensons comes to mind here. I know he doesn't score. But he's fast, he's strong and he could easily take some of O'Reilly's ice.
Girgensons is the opposite of strong, especially as it pertains to strength on his skates. He gets rag dolled off the puck with relative ease.