MarkusKetterer
Shoulda got one game in
I just want Mukhamadullin so Rob Ray can try to pronounce it![]()
It’d be Mukhaf***this. And that’s when he’d be sober enough to try to pronounce that
I just want Mukhamadullin so Rob Ray can try to pronounce it![]()
Don't forget his concussions!
In what world are they selling low on him? He had great production and a good season next to Dahlin. If anything, they are selling high on inflated stats from playing with Dahlin.I really think Buffalo will regret it if they sell low on him, and I don’t see any reason to. He’s a tremendous talent, but the Achilles injury is a hard one to come back from, and he obviously wasn’t able to have the summer he needed to before last season. He’s going to be cheap to bridge, so idk why we’d move him now when his value can only go up (and if the injury derails his whole career, then we’re not any worse off than if we traded him for junk).
In what world are they selling low on him? He had great production and a good season next to Dahlin. If anything, they are selling high on inflated stats from playing with Dahlin.
In what world are they selling low on him? He had great production and a good season next to Dahlin. If anything, they are selling high on inflated stats from playing with Dahlin.
Imo the Sabres should be moving Byram (or Power, if he returns the better player) for the best top six forward that he returns. Would they want Zegras? They already have a couple big boys up front so maybe a smaller playmaker would fit?
Is that a fair value trade: Byram for Zegras?
Why a top 6 forward? They are already one of the highest scoring teams in the league at 5v5. Their team's inability to play defense is their problem. Zegras certainly doesn't help thatImo the Sabres should be moving Byram (or Power, if he returns the better player) for the best top six forward that he returns. Would they want Zegras? They already have a couple big boys up front so maybe a smaller playmaker would fit?
Is that a fair value trade: Byram for Zegras?
So even with Dahlin and Power they need better defensive D?Why a top 6 forward? They are already one of the highest scoring teams in the league at 5v5. Their team's inability to play defense is their problem. Zegras certainly doesn't help that
So even with Dahlin and Power they need better defensive D?
Do you think Dahlin and Power play 60 minutes together?So even with Dahlin and Power they need better defensive D?
Neither of them are defensive dmen. Dahlin is fine but Power is only 22. They also have zero top 4 caliber RHD. Lastly it's 5v5, not 5v2. Your forwards need to also help outSo even with Dahlin and Power they need better defensive D?
100% agree, though I'm not sure if Ras is has them on his list. We know 2 teams (Vancouver and Edmonton), I could see a situation where even if Buffalo is on that list he waives there if they are willing to pay him. I highly doubt Coleman does though.It's funny, because I think Rasmus Andersson and Blake Coleman solve a lot of problems for the Sabres.
Cons:
- Expiring deals, one in 2026 the other in 2027.
- Buffalo is probably on Rasmus' 6 team no-trade.
- Buffalo won't be on Coleman's 10 team approved list.
But those are probably the type of players that help them take the next steps. Both are absolute leaders on/off the ice. Both log a bunch of minutes. Both play both ends of the ice very well. Both can also chip in at a good scoring clip.
Not sure if you read my post or not. Probably not. But I said Reilly to Vancouver for a forward or even a d because he’s from there. And then flip that said player to buffalo for byram. He requested a trade. They are gonna have to take what ever they can get.And Buffalo wants anything to do with Reilly because ????
Byram is probably worth more than Zegras imo. Dude is bad and can't stay healthy now. Power is worth Significantly more than Byram. Byram is being traded as a #2/3 D with PP1 potential. Power is a significantly higher upside version of Byram, with a huge physical trait advantage.Imo the Sabres should be moving Byram (or Power, if he returns the better player) for the best top six forward that he returns. Would they want Zegras? They already have a couple big boys up front so maybe a smaller playmaker would fit?
Is that a fair value trade: Byram for Zegras?
Agreed. Both of those guys would fill significant holes in our lineup.It's funny, because I think Rasmus Andersson and Blake Coleman solve a lot of problems for the Sabres.
Cons:
- Expiring deals, one in 2026 the other in 2027.
- Buffalo is probably on Rasmus' 6 team no-trade.
- Buffalo won't be on Coleman's 10 team approved list.
But those are probably the type of players that help them take the next steps. Both are absolute leaders on/off the ice. Both log a bunch of minutes. Both play both ends of the ice very well. Both can also chip in at a good scoring clip.
This is correct. We have exactly one defensive defenseman of significance on our roster in Samuelsson and he's a lefty and looked pretty brutal last year.Neither of them are defensive dmen. Dahlin is fine but Power is only 22. They also have zero top 4 caliber RHD. Lastly it's 5v5, not 5v2. Your forwards need to also help out
I'm not aware of Byram suffering any type of achilles injury, concussions absolutely, but as that gets further out I'd imagine that becomes less of an issue. There was talk about Quinn in this thread who ruptured his achilles, so I think you might be thinking about that.Good player, but with the achilles and the concussions, buyer beware. Not sure he'll have longevity in the NHL.
ANDERSSON is not what Buffalo wants.It's funny, because I think Rasmus Andersson and Blake Coleman solve a lot of problems for the Sabres.
Cons:
- Expiring deals, one in 2026 the other in 2027.
- Buffalo is probably on Rasmus' 6 team no-trade.
- Buffalo won't be on Coleman's 10 team approved list.
But those are probably the type of players that help them take the next steps. Both are absolute leaders on/off the ice. Both log a bunch of minutes. Both play both ends of the ice very well. Both can also chip in at a good scoring clip.
Dahlin plays RD. He did before bring drafted and plays betterNeither of them are defensive dmen. Dahlin is fine but Power is only 22. They also have zero top 4 caliber RHD. Lastly it's 5v5, not 5v2. Your forwards need to also help out
Not sure if you read my post or not. Probably not. But I said Reilly to Vancouver for a forward or even a d because he’s from there. And then flip that said player to buffalo for byram. He requested a trade. They are gonna have to take what ever they can get.
Dahlin can't play 60 minutes. And while Power is OK at playing defense in transition.......once the play bogs down in our end, he gets lost FAST. Kind of the same for Byram.So even with Dahlin and Power they need better defensive D?
Right handed top 4 defenseman that is a team leader and warrior. Is also a great PKer and solid at defending in his own zone. Also making 4.55M. Sure there are probably better fits but good luck getting them, teams generally don't give away the type of player you are looking for.ANDERSSON is not what Buffalo wants.
Nobody is arguing that Dahlin plays RD. He's not right handed though. Buffalo factually has zero top 4 right handed defensemen.Dahlin plays RD. He did before bring drafted and plays better
They want a def first RD to play with Power or byram
Samurlsson when healthy plays well e
with Dahlin
This right here is where Andersson is the opposite. Andersson is not a fast skater so generally he gets beat on the rush, however he is very solid in his own zone. He's great at getting in shooting lanes and winning board battles in the corner or in front of the net.Dahlin can't play 60 minutes. And while Power is OK at playing defense in transition.......once the play bogs down in our end, he gets lost FAST. Kind of the same for Byram.
Our 2nd best D at playing defense is likely Connor Clifton. Samuelsson certainly SHOULD be our 2nd best D at playing defense, but his head got lodged in his ass at some point.
So to answer your question -- YES. We need at least 2 defensemen who play defense well. Maybe 3.