is the answer jesus
Registered User
Absolutely. I don't see a plausible trade scenario between us and the Sens though. Karlsson would be an absolute god send for us.Are you guys interested in Erik Karlsson at all?
Absolutely. I don't see a plausible trade scenario between us and the Sens though. Karlsson would be an absolute god send for us.Are you guys interested in Erik Karlsson at all?
Absolutely. I don't see a plausible trade scenario between us and the Sens though. Karlsson would be an absolute god send for us.
Right... hence the middle section of my post about bringing in guys who can impose their work ethic and attitude on the room and take Eichel down in the pecking order a few notches (from a leadership perspective). The problem is that guys like that, that also bring it on the ice, don't come cheap.If a NHL locker room full of NHL vets are swayed easily from doing their job by a 20 year old Eichel's attitude, then I want nothing to do with those guys. Until it is proven that HE is the THE influence of why guys who have played at least 5 years in the league are playing with little care, then I'm not going to say he is THE problem with that room. Either way, they need to get a VET coach that will bring order and accountability to that room so that a 20 year old player can't hijack a locker room full of NHL veterans.
Right... hence the middle section of my post about bringing in guys who can impose their work ethic and attitude on the room and take Eichel down in the pecking order a few notches (from a leadership perspective). The problem is that guys like that, that also bring it on the ice, don't come cheap.
And yes, a stronger-willed coach would probably help.
All my own speculation anyways, not like I have any idea what actually goes on in the room.
Not so much that he "influenced them"... perhaps just that the vets in the room were never great leaders, and defer to Eichel because it's easier, because of his status or authority in the organization, and/or because that he has a stronger (albeit immature/petulant) personality.So of you're of the opinion he did influence these vets. I'm of the opinion, that he didn't. You're making a big assumption for a basis of getting rid of guys which could be false.
Because in a better situation, he's a legit top 6 two-way center/Selke candidate. GM's would line up for a player like that, even at his inflated price tag.I'd like to hear some arguments for hanging on to ROR.
I think he's too slow to be slotted in the Sabres center depth. I'd be fine with him at wing, which is where he has found ALL his success with the Canadian national team. But he seems to best fit into a 3rd line role on a top-end team and I think you have to ask whether that is worth the contract term and dollar amount. He's certainly a good FO guy, and someone you would want to work into critical draws. But the Sabres are paying for production and he doesn't seem to have the ability to do that consistently over the course of 82 games.Because in a better situation, he's a legit top 6 two-way center/Selke candidate. GM's would line up for a player like that, even at his inflated price tag.
He just can't be expected to lead/motivate the room, and can't be asked to play an obscene amount of minutes every night.
I think it's a environment issue, moreso than talent, personally. They just aren't leaders. They aren't motivators, they're "motivatees". Most of these guys would probably see a boost in production on other teams with different expectations (less complacent), a better locker room and a better foundation.I think he's too slow to be slotted in the Sabres center depth. I'd be fine with him at wing, which is where he has found ALL his success with the Canadian national team. But he seems to best fit into a 3rd line role on a top-end team and I think you have to ask whether that is worth the contract term and dollar amount. He's certainly a good FO guy, and someone you would want to work into critical draws. But the Sabres are paying for production and he doesn't seem to have the ability to do that consistently over the course of 82 games.
Carolina makes sense to trade ROR or Reinhart for Hanifin. I don't think Reinhart gets it done but ROR would work...sucks to lose ROR but with Hanifin and drafting a defenceman in the first round our defensive worries are over.
He's talented - but he's been in this top-6 center role for two coaches not counting COL, and frankly the environment argument is growing long in the tooth: just another incarnation of 'bad system'. We all blamed Bylsma. Now it must be Housley.I think it's a environment issue, moreso than talent, personally. They just aren't leaders. They aren't motivators, they're "motivatees". Most of these guys would probably see a boost in production on other teams with different expectations (less complacent), a better locker room and a better foundation.
I think some people are still holding out hope the Sabres can turn into that in some way or another. And don't want to move key players like ROR before we get there.
I'd like to hear some arguments for hanging on to ROR.
Pouliot, Pominville with retention, Larsson, Girgensons, Nolan, Gorges, Falk, McCabe , Josefson, Johnson and Lehner could all be in the move without batting an eye.
Which you can then use to bring back ROR to BUF when you finally admit the folly of trading him.We could get a boatload of 6th round picks. That should put us on the right track...
Who on the Sabres hasn't gotten steamrolled all season?ROR is getting steamrolled. Girgensons did just as well at that role during the tank years as O'Reilly is doing now. He is a -19 through 27 games. That says everything.
Sell sell sell sell!If Chad Johnson and Robin Lehner are the pieces teams want, then the future is bleaker than I feared.
No, that means we can actually shift the crap we have. I take it as a positive.If Chad Johnson and Robin Lehner are the pieces teams want, then the future is bleaker than I feared.
If Chad Johnson and Robin Lehner are the pieces teams want, then the future is bleaker than I feared.
I am sure Carolina will give him away at 3rd pairing value...lol. He is a top 4 defenderRule #1 about trading for defensemen. Don't pay 1st pairing prices for young defensemen playing 3rd pairing roles.
I am sure Carolina will give him away at 3rd pairing value...lol. He is a top 4 defender
I am sure Carolina will give him away at 3rd pairing value...lol. He is a top 4 defender