If it’s 1st overall maybe something around that+ Peterka and maybe Benson for Brock Faber? He’s a dman you win a cup with
Edit- yes definitely overpay in a vacuum but would Minnesota actually trade him for less? Not a fan of either team.
Curious what you think Powers value is. I don't think there is an add to get Charlie. Power is on his ELC as a #1 overall D. That is easily 3 firsts of value.
If it’s 1st overall maybe something around that+ Peterka and maybe Benson for Brock Faber? He’s a dman you win a cup with
Edit- yes definitely overpay in a vacuum but would Minnesota actually trade him for less? Not a fan of either team.
Idk was thinking Peterka, Benson and 1st overall 2025 would be to much to pass upWhy would they trade him at all?
Yeah. Not one GM would be dumb enough to move Faber!There is zero reason for Wild to trade Faber even for an overpay
@BeerzNot trading sabres #1 for a RD if its top 5.
We want a RD U27 with term/ control
If we just ignore what the fanbase would say wouldn’t the shrewd move be to trade Thompson and Dahlin? Buffalo won’t be a serious contender in the next 10 years. They need serious talents not mature NHL stars.Power is not on his ELC.
We need to forget Powers draft position becuase it is irrelevant now.
My hope would be to convince a rebuilding team that you have a 22yo young stud locked up for 7 more years. Power and Benson? Power and Peterka? Probably right that nothing but Power + the 2025 1st gets McAvoy, but spitballing here.
Thats my take, but apparently no one in Buffalo agrees because "we cant stomach another tank/rebuild" so they've convinced themselves theyre a few moves away.If we just ignore what the fanbase would say wouldn’t the shrewd move be to trade Thompson and Dahlin? Buffalo won’t be a serious contender in the next 10 years. They need serious talents not mature NHL stars.
@Beerz
I thought you guys said there is absolutely zero interest for new prospects in the system after 2025?
Of course. However, nothing wrong with tagging a respected member like Beerz for a second opinion. Especially in a unclear subject like thisI can speak for myself just fine....
Most top 10 picks, that were known st the time being top 10, that were traded outright for players were generally bad trades for the team that gave up the 1st round pick.I am all for trading this pick. But.. top 10 picks are rarely traded.
We may have no choice but to use it.
Have any examples?Most top 10 picks, that were known st the time being top 10, that were traded outright for players were generally bad trades for the team that gave up the 1st round pick.
Idk was thinking Peterka, Benson and 1st overall 2025 would be to much to pass up
If the pick falls straight on Martone, I'd give you Mailloux, Habs first or Flames depending on which is highest, PIT 2nd and Habs 3rd.
OP could have saved himself a lot of time doing this if he simply wanted one fo these and no other discussions around the topic. Which of the following will that pick bring back that would make the Sabres competitive today?Did you read the OP? The point would be to get a player who helps now, not a collection of inferior prospects.
So draft the top ranked RHD with that likely top 5 pick. You guys arent competing anytime soon.
I think it needs a blow up, but ill play the none rebuilding game. Retool via McKenna.
2025 1st - If you win, you go for Schaefer and trade Byram or Power for a RHD. If not, trade down for Mrtka or Hensler assuming you HAVE to draft a D with that pick.
2026 1st - suck for McKenna! Hes worth it!
Ugh capwages is sad for the Sabres. Paying Skinner until 2030. What losers. This team isnt close to being good.