Proposal: S.Pinto (OTT) for R.Andersson (CGY)

Hobnobs

Pinko
Nov 29, 2011
9,375
2,733
Loads of tweaks needed. Why would Flames trade a top-pairing defenseman man for a currently awful 2nd liner with 3 points in 12 games?
 

FLAMESFAN

Registered User
Feb 27, 2002
5,421
1,333
Trading Ras was part of the tank thought. We clearly aren't taking that direction, so we'll need to play Ras. As a poster pointed out already we have no one to take his minutes. He's a very important part of this team.
 
  • Like
Reactions: KevinRedkey

KevinRedkey

12/18/23 and beyond!
Jan 22, 2010
10,528
5,817
Id be interested in Pinto but not for Rasmus straight up. What are Ottawa’s needs?

If Andersson (or Weegar) aren't coming the other way, I don't think they'd deal Pinto. They also don't have much else that's realistic they'd throw on top to get either of them. Outside of Yakemchuk (who they won't trade), their prospect pool is weak. They also won't deal a 1st since it's too risky and they are losing one in the next 2 years as well (Dadonov fiasco).

TBH I didn't realise Calgary was doing so well, so the idea of this trade is no longer valid. It would be dumb of them to sell Andersson now. I was under the impression Calgary was meh, and that's my fault for not paying closer attention.

To answer your question about what Ottawa needs:
- A stronger mental game and/or better luck
- Ullmark to play to the level he's capable of
- RD to make Hamonic/JBD sit in the press box
- LW that can contribute (Perron hasn't been that unfortunately)
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad