Today I sit and fly home and for the first time in years feel absolutely free. I will start by saying I did request to be taken off of WWE television until myself and Vince could get a yes or no on a new deal. This has been going on since my IC Title run and had been nothing but a major strain on my life as all I ever wanted to do was work for WWE. I was told to head home until we agree or not agree to specific terms and contrary to reports it isn’t over money or a bus that stuff was settled a while ago. It comes down to a major problem I have with not only WWE but wrestling in general.
Wrestling is pre determined, we as performers know before we go out to that ring or perform a backstage scene who is winning and losing etc or have a general idea of what we are going to say. It blows my mind how in a sport which is pre determined from a company standpoint winners are paid so much more than the losers. Every single person who works for WWE from top to bottom is absolutely just as valuable as the next. The winners cannot win unless the losers go out there and agree to lose to them.
That seems really asinine either side can actually trademark "the big guy."
Like, that's not a specific identity. Do you know how many "big guys" there are in WWE, let alone everywhere else? Both sides should be denied.
He's probably good as gone.
I think there's a fair argument to be made that the mark is merely descriptive, but the fact that it made it through to publication is a good sign for him.That seems really asinine either side can actually trademark "the big guy."
Like, that's not a specific identity. Do you know how many "big guys" there are in WWE, let alone everywhere else? Both sides should be denied.
He's probably good as gone.
That seems really asinine either side can actually trademark "the big guy."
Like, that's not a specific identity. Do you know how many "big guys" there are in WWE, let alone everywhere else? Both sides should be denied.
He's probably good as gone.
He certainly won't get a patent for it.I think "The Big Guy" is too generic a phrase to patent and I am betting that these applications get rejected.
One can trademark generic terms, but descriptive terms need to have acquired distinctiveness to be considered. That'll be the argument that he (or the WWE) will have to make.i dont think it matters if its too generic.
its like "the rock". its a wrestling nickname he wants to use for other events.
his point actually makes sense, the guys making the money and being pushed wont get over without the help of those that lose to them and help get them there
We are on a hockey board where guys like Ovechkin get paid to score goals. I would think people here would understand that you need to be a productive player here better than most.
If he leaves we'll all miss him trying to garner cheap heap by ripping off a much more popular wrestler he claims to hate.
Speaking of that, isn't it funny that a CM Punk hater might end up walking out over his frustration at his place on the card at mania?
So... Ryback is trying to revolutionize the way wrestling contracts are dealt. That is... interesting. I completely agree with what he's saying, but it's not even remotely possible. Are you talking base salaries with no more t-shirt/merch/ppv main event bonuses?
I would need to hear his actual negotiation before making a determination on if i think this is stupid or not. I can tell you this - the big guy is not dumb. He makes a very valid point here and WWE has gone to far lengths to make sure it doesn't step into the new world of business. WWE is a "do what I say" company. I sort of love when wrestlers try to stop that. That says a lot in the locker room I bet.