But hopefully it doesn't "have to be" 3 or 4. I'm hoping for 2 max (and this year counts), so I would be willing to go through 1 more year of sucking, but want to see a bunch of young fleet footing kids making mistakes and learning from them. Playing together all year and growing TOGETHER. That would be fun and something we must go though despite the losing. At least it may be for a good cause......eventually.fair enough. Personally I'd rather watch 3 or 4 years of trash followed by 10 years of success rather than watching 13 or 14 years of mediocrity.
fair enough. Personally I'd rather watch 3 or 4 years of trash followed by 10 years of success rather than watching 13 or 14 years of mediocrity.
Absolutely all of it driven by the greatest goalie of this generation who we got in the 7th round....So I guess anything less than a stanley cup is mediocrity to you. This team has gone to three conference finals including a trip to the finals in the last 7 years. Hell, they should have been in another conference finals last year if AV wasn't such a jackass. I have enjoyed all of them even though they haven't won it all. Now is the time to go in a different direction as Gorton has done but you can't look back and say the last 7 years or so has been just mediocre. It's just not true.
Spooner now only trails Barzal, Kucherov, MacKinnon, and Marchand in points/60.
He just passed up, um....Connor McDavid![]()
Real question on spooner....how many of his points are secondary?
When looking at p/60 isn't primary the more important metric to use?
Agreed...just feel like a great number of his points so far have been mostly driven by other players...granted he's been real good..but still....I think it's a good indicator to look at primary points, but not all secondary points are garbage. Last night for instance, he had that pass to Gilmour that basically set up the entire breakaway. To me, it's difficult to completely ignore secondary points
I think it's a good indicator to look at primary points, but not all secondary points are garbage. Last night for instance, he had that pass to Gilmour that basically set up the entire breakaway. To me, it's difficult to completely ignore secondary points
I still wonder why the Bruins decided to get rid of him. He is playing quite good now. What was wrong with him in Boston?
I still wonder why the Bruins decided to get rid of him. He is playing quite good now. What was wrong with him in Boston?
Real question on spooner....how many of his points are secondary?
When looking at p/60 isn't primary the more important metric to use?
17 of his 27 5v5 points are primary (9G, 8A). For all situations, 23 of his 36 points are primary (11G, 12A). I tend to look at all of those different factors to see if someone can drive play or has been racking up a lot of secondary points. I think there's a weird stigma around secondary points, but it's not that they're bad, it's just that they're not really repeatable in the long run.Real question on spooner....how many of his points are secondary?
When looking at p/60 isn't primary the more important metric to use?
Hope you guys are enjoying Spooner.
As for Nash, he can dominate shifts, but like you guys were saying, he may lead the league in "almosts".
He's shifty, fights to the slot, dangerous on the rush, he could easily have 3-4 more goals.
But I feel like that's been a theme of his for the last couples seasons.
Great move into a scoring area, then puck falls of the end of his stick, shot gets blocked, shoots when he should have held a half second more, etc.
Overall though pretty happy.
Hope you guys are enjoying Spooner.
As for Nash, he can dominate shifts, but like you guys were saying, he may lead the league in "almosts".
He's shifty, fights to the slot, dangerous on the rush, he could easily have 3-4 more goals.
But I feel like that's been a theme of his for the last couples seasons.
Great move into a scoring area, then puck falls of the end of his stick, shot gets blocked, shoots when he should have held a half second more, etc.
Overall though pretty happy.
Basically sums up his entire careerHope you guys are enjoying Spooner.
As for Nash, he can dominate shifts, but like you guys were saying, he may lead the league in "almosts".
He's shifty, fights to the slot, dangerous on the rush, he could easily have 3-4 more goals.
But I feel like that's been a theme of his for the last couples seasons.
Great move into a scoring area, then puck falls of the end of his stick, shot gets blocked, shoots when he should have held a half second more, etc.
Overall though pretty happy.
Real question on spooner....how many of his points are secondary?
When looking at p/60 isn't primary the more important metric to use?
Real question on spooner....how many of his points are secondary?
When looking at p/60 isn't primary the more important metric to use?