Can honestly see ROR shoving Tavares out of the #2C hole.
Tribute Ryan O'Reilly welcome to the Toronto Maple Leafs appreciation thread
- Thread starter LeafsNation75
- Start date
-
Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
ROR is also someone I love watching and I can't wait to see him with the Leafs.
AM on one line, MM on another, follow by ROR and Kampf. And you add in Acciari, Bunting, Engvall, JT and Willie on the side. I would say, they are pretty good, lol.
If he's still this good then that's definitely something to be excited about.
Nice, he will play his 1000th game as a leaf. Welcome aboard.
I didn't expect it to happen so soon. Consider me pleasantly surprised.
WillyC
Registered User
- Sep 7, 2018
- 1,132
- 1,728
William Hylander
There can be only 1
- Aug 17, 2009
- 2,618
- 353
Peace Frog
“Go on, say your thing man”
- Jun 18, 2009
- 2,267
- 629
Peace Frog
“Go on, say your thing man”
- Jun 18, 2009
- 2,267
- 629
I suspect the main reason for putting him in that position is that he has played with both Marner and Tavares before in international games. And they may have felt that he'd slip in easier by having him center the lane rather than worrying about playing a different position. I wouldn't be surprised if they run that same line out there tomorrow night against Chicago but then start looking at other combos over the next couple of weeks.
LeafsNation75
Registered User
Peace Frog
“Go on, say your thing man”
- Jun 18, 2009
- 2,267
- 629
Rob Brown
Way She Goes
- Dec 17, 2009
- 17,561
- 14,729
Mickey Marner
Registered User
yurnxt
Registered User
- Apr 7, 2009
- 410
- 394
I love that they put JT at wing for ROR because while I'm confident ROR can effectively play wing, he NEEDS to be in the middle of the ice to control the play, shut down the opposition and for ROR to be able to get the most out of his ridiculously active stick and positioning instincts. You want that guy in the middle of the ice whether it's on a line with JT or on a different line all together. If he is on a line with JT, it is likely JT able to do more from the wing than ROR.
As I've said before, playing ROR anywhere else but the middle is a waste of his full capabilities and neuters what he brings to the table somewhat.
Last edited:
LeafsNation75
Registered User
During O'Reilly's first shift of the game here was Joe Bowen's broadcast of it and at one point he said, "O'Reilly to Rielly, I knew this was going to be difficult."
After the trade was announced I knew he would say something like that if O'Reilly and Rielly were on the ice together and passed the puck to each other.
After the trade was announced I knew he would say something like that if O'Reilly and Rielly were on the ice together and passed the puck to each other.
BayStBullies
Burn the Boats!
- Apr 1, 2012
- 5,621
- 5,145
What a beauty. I need an O'Reilly St. Pats jersey.
LeafsNation75
Registered User
I think O'Rielly has individually looked good through the first couple games, but I'm not sure the line configuration really works that well.
We find ourselves in a rare situation of having 5 players we'd really want to have at center, and one of them has to move to wing. I think Acciari probably makes the most sense to move to wing, as he's probably our worst faceoff guy, and it frees him up to utilize his physicality along the boards.
Once Knies signs (assuming a maybe optimistic transition), it would be awesome to run:
Bunting - Matthews - Marner
Kerfoot - Tavares - Nylander
Knies - O'Rielly - Jarnkrok
Engvall - Kampf - Acciari
Line 1 was one of the best lines in the league when it was together. Matthews and Marner have insane chemistry, and Marner amplifies Matthews' best asset. It gives that line two selke caliber forwards, helping to shut down the opponent's best lines as well. Bunting has proven to be a skilled triggerman to capitalize on Marner's playmaking and the pressure the duo can create.
Line 2's configuration gets a lot of hate, but in the 540 minutes at 5v5 that they've had together since 2020, they have a 54.8 xGF% and a positive goal differential despite horrible goaltending behind them. They've actually produced pretty well as a line, and while they were only together for 44 minutes this season, they were dominant in that time. Kerfoot has better chemistry with Nylander and Tavares than most players on our team, and their shots help cover for Kerfoot's weakness in that area and gives Kerfoot somebody to capitalize on his playmaking. And it gives Tavares two fast players to help cover for his speed. People might feel better about this being a line with more scoring from the 3rd line.
Line 3's configuration gives Knies two defensively responsible forwards to help ease him into the NHL, and gives Knies a chance to learn from O'Rielly. Knies and Jarnkrok both have shots to capitalize on O'Rielly's playmaking, and Jarnkrok has good speed to cover for O'Rielly.
Line 4 is a defensive master, and not too far off last year's 3rd line. Capable of generating a cycle, and a good mix of playmaking, shots, speed, physicality, etc. Not a concern if it gets line matched or caught out, and has two centers in the event of an icing.
All lines have at least two defensively conscious players, at least one good faceoff centreman, and a good balance of skillsets. Three have good to great offensive potential, and the other has a good chance to outperform their matchup, and aren't a concern in terms of getting caught.
I'm struggling to find a forward lineup that can match up to that.
We find ourselves in a rare situation of having 5 players we'd really want to have at center, and one of them has to move to wing. I think Acciari probably makes the most sense to move to wing, as he's probably our worst faceoff guy, and it frees him up to utilize his physicality along the boards.
Once Knies signs (assuming a maybe optimistic transition), it would be awesome to run:
Bunting - Matthews - Marner
Kerfoot - Tavares - Nylander
Knies - O'Rielly - Jarnkrok
Engvall - Kampf - Acciari
Line 1 was one of the best lines in the league when it was together. Matthews and Marner have insane chemistry, and Marner amplifies Matthews' best asset. It gives that line two selke caliber forwards, helping to shut down the opponent's best lines as well. Bunting has proven to be a skilled triggerman to capitalize on Marner's playmaking and the pressure the duo can create.
Line 2's configuration gets a lot of hate, but in the 540 minutes at 5v5 that they've had together since 2020, they have a 54.8 xGF% and a positive goal differential despite horrible goaltending behind them. They've actually produced pretty well as a line, and while they were only together for 44 minutes this season, they were dominant in that time. Kerfoot has better chemistry with Nylander and Tavares than most players on our team, and their shots help cover for Kerfoot's weakness in that area and gives Kerfoot somebody to capitalize on his playmaking. And it gives Tavares two fast players to help cover for his speed. People might feel better about this being a line with more scoring from the 3rd line.
Line 3's configuration gives Knies two defensively responsible forwards to help ease him into the NHL, and gives Knies a chance to learn from O'Rielly. Knies and Jarnkrok both have shots to capitalize on O'Rielly's playmaking, and Jarnkrok has good speed to cover for O'Rielly.
Line 4 is a defensive master, and not too far off last year's 3rd line. Capable of generating a cycle, and a good mix of playmaking, shots, speed, physicality, etc. Not a concern if it gets line matched or caught out, and has two centers in the event of an icing.
All lines have at least two defensively conscious players, at least one good faceoff centreman, and a good balance of skillsets. Three have good to great offensive potential, and the other has a good chance to outperform their matchup, and aren't a concern in terms of getting caught.
I'm struggling to find a forward lineup that can match up to that.
koyvoo
Registered User
- Nov 8, 2014
- 17,812
- 17,925
A player like this, who can elevate their compete level at this time of year…there is no stat to properly measure balls.
I hope certain people are starting to learn. You needs stars. But you need warriors, too.
I hope certain people are starting to learn. You needs stars. But you need warriors, too.
I honestly feel like O'Reilly's been our best player in the playoffs. Him and Marner of course. Morgan is a close 3rd. O'Reilly is much more of the Bergeron/Toews mold then Matthews imo. If Matthews is your 3rd or 4th best player in the playoffs, that's a scary thought for other teams.
