Hype has a lot to do, how prospect is seen
First of all, I see why Bjorkstand slide so long down in the draft.
With his scores, even in his first year, he could easily been a first round. If it was not for his size and that most saw him as a raw only goal score.
Personally I think that was misread.
But as a raw goal score, there are to many examples, that they fails in the bigger leagues.
I knew that Bjorkstand would probably build up and be something like a late to grow into a man. How? I saw his dad play and grow better and better. Where I saw a lot of other players fathers, well loose their advantages.
The hype part, well I never understood the hype on Filatov, Boeker or Eller. The hype con come from a lot of sources. Press, different leaders, nationalities. Where you live can even effect.
Where I live, we never use extreme words. We would never say he is extremely good. That mean it would mean, here, that he was bad, if did so. We would say he do quite OK, if we mean he is extreme good.
I live in a town of 50000, in the next town, same size. They would say about a guy, just OK, that he is super.
Now, two people call a scout.
town 1: We have a guy, he do quite OK (he is the best)
town 2: We have a guy, he is super good (he is just OK)
Now you sees how hype come, because in Toronto they are clearly like in town 2. So they are in Copenhagen Denmark.
Boedker, Eller, Tavaras etc comes from Copenhagen, Toronto and a like. Tavaras the new Sidney Crosby, wasn't he? He is good, but not that good...
In Herning, where Oliver comes, they will say that, He is doing quite OK.
So a lot about how high the ranking goes, has a lot to do with hype.
Take my word, Oliver Bjorkstand will become a star in NHL. Probably better than any of Torontos current prospect. He will grow better and better until 37 or so, if he follows his father template and I think he will.
