RW Matvei Michkov - SKA-1946 St.Petersburg, MHL (2023 Draft)

Status
Not open for further replies.

GermanSpitfire

EU Video Scout for McKeen’s | Rest Easy #13
Jul 20, 2020
12,398
22,449
www.mckeenshockey.com
No, just no.
No, just no.
Kucherov’s stats at the same age line up quite favourable with Michkov, and seeing what Kucherov has done at the NHL level that’s no slant against Michkov.
Abramov is a bit of a reach however the amount
of hype from Abramov as a 14/15 year old is similar to that of Michkov.
 

Fantomas

Registered User
Aug 7, 2012
13,665
7,310
Kucherov’s stats at the same age line up quite favourable with Michkov, and seeing what Kucherov has done at the NHL level that’s no slant against Michkov.

Michkov is a top prospect. Kucherov wasn't. Maybe he should have been, but wasn't.

He had no international pedigree and went under the radar until he was 17. Not comparable.
 

Atas2000

Registered User
Jan 18, 2011
13,601
3,269
Kucherov’s stats at the same age line up quite favourable with Michkov, and seeing what Kucherov has done at the NHL level that’s no slant against Michkov.
Abramov is a bit of a reach however the amount
of hype from Abramov as a 14/15 year old is similar to that of Michkov.
Let's not even talk about Abramov here. A totally different level. And Abramov never had that kind of hype. Kucherov had his first season the MHL(in which he was PPG) at age 16-17.
 

JotAlan

Registered User
Apr 21, 2020
448
254
Why isn't Michkov in the game today? Injured? Did you go back to Varyagi?
 

Pavel Buchnevich

"Pavel Buchnevich The Fake"
Dec 8, 2013
60,048
26,774
New York
He wasn't as good as Michkov in the U16 league and at the Olympics.

I think he was a similar caliber prospect. Maybe not as good at junior hockey. I think Michkov is a great prospect, potentially 1OA caliber eventually, but I think he’s the type of player who will fare better in junior hockey than pro hockey. I think a lot aren’t accounting for that. It doesn’t mean he won’t be a great player, but it does mean that we need to not only look at his junior numbers. We need to look at how his skillset projects to the NHL. Jack Hughes was another example of this that I pointed out at the time. He beat records of players like Eichel and Matthews, but I thought it was always clear stylistically his junior game wouldn’t translate as well stylistically as those two to the NHL.
 

Fiamma

Registered User
Oct 20, 2020
3
2
What will be the tournament?
Between the national teams Belarus U18, Belarus U17, Russia U17 and Russia U16.
Scheduled from 5 to 7 November. But yesterday it was canceled due to an outbreak of infection among the players of one of the Belarus teams
 
  • Like
Reactions: JotAlan

JotAlan

Registered User
Apr 21, 2020
448
254
I think he was a similar caliber prospect. Maybe not as good at junior hockey. I think Michkov is a great prospect, potentially 1OA caliber eventually, but I think he’s the type of player who will fare better in junior hockey than pro hockey. I think a lot aren’t accounting for that. It doesn’t mean he won’t be a great player, but it does mean that we need to not only look at his junior numbers. We need to look at how his skillset projects to the NHL. Jack Hughes was another example of this that I pointed out at the time. He beat records of players like Eichel and Matthews, but I thought it was always clear stylistically his junior game wouldn’t translate as well stylistically as those two to the NHL.

I agree in parts. Remember that Jack Hughes is at least 6 months younger and much less physically developed at the same age in the first season. I can't say that Hughes will be as successful as Eichel / Matthews, but he has the potential to be on the same level. I say the same about Michkov.
 
Last edited:

Pavel Buchnevich

"Pavel Buchnevich The Fake"
Dec 8, 2013
60,048
26,774
New York
I agree in parts. Remember that Jack Hughes is at least 6 months younger and much less physically developed at the same age. I can't say that Hughes will be as successful as Eichel / Matthews, but he has the potential to be on the same level. I say the same about Michkov.

I don't agree. There's a threshold where the stats stop mattering, and I think we've arrived there. No one thinks Michkov and the prior example of Hughes won't be very good players, but saying someone was better at junior hockey or scored more points stops mattering at a certain point where their point totals are all great at the junior hockey level and they are all very good junior hockey players.

It really won't end up mattering who was better than who in junior or who scored the most points. It'll matter how they translate to the NHL, and I think a player like Michkov's lack of size and top level skating will make a small difference compared to someone like Svechnikov. As for Hughes, I've long mentioned that I think he will lack in non-scoring parts of the game compared to Eichel, and even Matthews.

It's not a slight on any of these players, but I completely disagree with any comparison thats based entirely or almost entirely off of junior point totals or who was better at junior hockey. If you want to say someone is a better prospect, make it an argument about how their games translate to the NHL. If it's not that, I'm not buying the argument.
 

JotAlan

Registered User
Apr 21, 2020
448
254
I don't agree. There's a threshold where the stats stop mattering, and I think we've arrived there. No one thinks Michkov and the prior example of Hughes won't be very good players, but saying someone was better at junior hockey or scored more points stops mattering at a certain point where their point totals are all great at the junior hockey level and they are all very good junior hockey players.

It really won't end up mattering who was better than who in junior or who scored the most points. It'll matter how they translate to the NHL, and I think a player like Michkov's lack of size and top level skating will make a small difference compared to someone like Svechnikov. As for Hughes, I've long mentioned that I think he will lack in non-scoring parts of the game compared to Eichel, and even Matthews.

It's not a slight on any of these players, but I completely disagree with any comparison thats based entirely or almost entirely off of junior point totals or who was better at junior hockey. If you want to say someone is a better prospect, make it an argument about how their games translate to the NHL. If it's not that, I'm not buying the argument.

I agree, but at no time did I pay attention to the numbers. You are doing this. And yes, I think Michkov will have a hard time if his speed doesn't improve, but that is not all and he will probably evolve accordingly. He's only 15 years old. John Tavares is also not an insane skater, but that didn't stop him from being one of the best scorers of his generation.
 

Kshahdoo

Registered User
Mar 23, 2008
20,438
10,215
Moscow, Russia
I agree, but at no time did I pay attention to the numbers. You are doing this. And yes, I think Michkov will have a hard time if his speed doesn't improve, but that is not all and he will probably evolve accordingly. He's only 15 years old. John Tavares is also not an insane skater, but that didn't stop him from being one of the best scorers of his generation.

Gusev is even slower skater, than Michkov, but he did ok in his first NHL season on a terrible team, and will probably be even better next season.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JotAlan

Habs76

Registered User
Nov 11, 2014
7,672
1,751
Fredericton, NB
People are forgetting I think that skating does come with age, because it's so closely correlated with strength. Michkov's edgework and stride are both excellent, he just doesn't have a blazing top gear (his top speed is above average, honestly).

Well I don't think that's a red flag regardless, considering he's a more methodical player than a physical tools-reliant player, it's likely to change with time anyways.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JotAlan
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad