What an awful take.For some reason, Svechnikov just screams pre-draft Yakupov to me...Both in the OHL, touted as "pure goal scorers", yet both don't score any goals at their respective WJC.
What an awful take.For some reason, Svechnikov just screams pre-draft Yakupov to me...Both in the OHL, touted as "pure goal scorers", yet both don't score any goals at their respective WJC.
This analysis seems off on several levels. First, Svechnikov's two-way play is actually quite strong and I would never say that he lacks intensity. And, even if Svechnikov WAS lacking in ability to play a 200ft game, Backstrom is one of the last players I would compare him to in that case. Backstrom is one of the league's better two-way centers and is deployed in all situations.not at all
yakupov has great intensity but has no clue of the structure of the game
svech seems very aware of options on the ice at all times, good instincts and reaction but honestly to me has zero intensity and seems to lack any real backcheck or 200 foot game
he reminds allot of nicolas backstrom
as for not scoring in wjc; his ice time was extremely limited and his teamates seemed to intentionally not want to use him
This analysis seems off on several levels. First, Svechnikov's two-way play is actually quite strong and I would never say that he lacks intensity. And, even if Svechnikov WAS lacking in ability to play a 200ft game, Backstrom is one of the last players I would compare him to in that case. Backstrom is one of the league's better two-way centers and is deployed in all situations.
what are you talking about? That is completely wrong.I believe he had better numbers than Eichel did. Svechnikov is certainly better than Hischier or Patrick
Yak wasnt drafted 1st overall if he had just a shot and chaotic uncontrollable speed, whatever that means.And yeah this comparison wth Yakupov is ridiculous. Andrei is smart and really physical, Yak just has a shot and pretty chaotic uncontrollable speed.
Yak wasnt drafted 1st overall if he had just a shot and chaotic uncontrollable speed, whatever that means.
Yak wasnt drafted 1st overall if he had just a shot and chaotic uncontrollable speed, whatever that means.
Look, I already said this earlier in this thread.What else did he have then? Don't remember anyone mentioning concerns about his hockey IQ at the time tho. Probably because on junior level his thinking was good enough and people's judgement was clouded by all those goals and energetic drive he produced.
Also it was very weak draft.
Look, I already said this earlier in this thread.
Always when a player has been a failure, the fans come out and say; he wasnt any good to begin with, player X or player Z in this draft is much better. Its always the same. Yak had 101 points the year before he was even eligible. I am pretty sure, people liked him a lot..
No its not any different. Only difference now is, we know for sure that Yakupov is a bust, so there's no discussion about that.
I’m talking about Eichel in USHL at the same agewhat are you talking about? That is completely wrong.
Eichel had 74 points in 40 games in the NCAA in his draft year.
Svechnikov had 58 points in 48 games in the USHL if he was drafted last year.
He scored way less and in a way easier league.
58 points in 48 games in USHL for draft season is good but not top 10 pick material.
Brock Boeser had 68 points in 57 games in his USHL draft season and he went 23rd.
I think you're missing the part where we're talking about IF svechnikov was drafted last year.I’m talking about Eichel in USHL at the same age
What? Svechnikov is in OHL in his draft year. I’m not sure what you are talking about.I think you're missing the part where we're talking about IF svechnikov was drafted last year.
Eichel was in USHL in his draft minus 1 year. Svech was there in his draft year. Even if we used those numbers, Eichel put up 2 ppg while being younger while svechnikov put up a little above 1
He doesn't even know what he's talking about.What? Svechnikov is in OHL in his draft year. I’m not sure what you are talking about.
Omg. Go back through the quotes to where it started. You joined a discussion halfway through. The poster said even if svechnikov was supposed to be in last year's draft, he would have gone firstWhat? Svechnikov is in OHL in his draft year. I’m not sure what you are talking about.
Do you people have the ability to readHe doesn't even know what he's talking about.
You're comparing Andrei's 16 year old season to Brock's 17 year old season.Do you people have the ability to read
He would have, thankfully scouts don't look at stat sheets to decide where people go. They would use projection, in which Svechnikov would have easily gone 1st in 2017 based on either his 16 year old USHL season or his 17 year old OHL season.Omg. Go back through the quotes to where it started. You joined a discussion halfway through. The poster said even if svechnikov was supposed to be in last year's draft, he would have gone first
He would have, thankfully scouts don't look at stat sheets to decide where people go. They would use projection, in which Svechnikov would have easily gone 1st in 2017 based on either his 16 year old USHL season or his 17 year old OHL season.
He would still be projected based on his USHL season, in which he was still a 6-3 winger with incredible speed/I.Q/vision/shot/passing.This hypothetical situation was started by someone's belief that even if Svechnikov was a year older last year and that was his draft year, he would've gone 1st overall. So, this situation is one where his OHL season is non-existent, and where he wasn't 16 last year, he was 17.
Is there any concern with this kid and the Russian factor ?