I would say Russia is about four years away from icing a tremendous team. A lot of good prospects are coming out of there, including on defense.
In 4 years, Datsyuk, Radulov, Malkin and Kovalchuk will be gone or much less effective. Who are you gonna fill in those top 2 center spots?
If the total body of international hockey competition is excluded from consideration in order to focus only on the order of finish in Olympic Games, as the Canadians insist on doing, then Russia has no claim to status higher than 5th or 6th in the World. If you are looking for the nation that has the greatest potential to totally reverse its position from 6th to 1st in a reasonably short time, only Russia has that potential.
Russia is the weakest team in the top 6 NT?![]()
Sweden would only need Finnish goalies and forwards to be the best team in the world. And Finnish coach of course.
They have lost the last four or five best-on-best tournaments against Finland.Russia is easily better than the Czechs and arguably better (on paper) than Finland.
Sweden would only need Finnish goalies and forwards to be the best team in the world. And Finnish coach of course.
Finnish offense is pretty good actually, even without NHL players. WJC 2016 might have been the first time in history when Finland completely relied on offense.Finnish forwards?![]()
Canada
Sweden
USA
Finland
Russia
Czech Republic
Slovakia
Switzerland
My ranking at the moment. I agree with the earlier poster that Russia has the most potential to turn it around on the ready. They really need to shed the Kovalchuk and Radulov stink that had been surrounding their national hockey team in the past couple of big tournaments.
Finnish offense is pretty good actually, even without NHL players. WJC 2016 might have been the first time in history when Finland completely relied on offense.
Meh. One guy gives his controversial opinion about something, another guy takes offence and decides to ask the world.
Just another typical day at HFBoards.
Yes, Russia hasn't medaled in best-on-best in 14 years. However, anyone ranking them based on that is putting too much emphasis on the years, and too little on the sample size.