No but the Jets have assets and if a team is actively pursuing or wanting one of those then including Mason could be an option.
There are many avenues available, doesn't mean it's easy street but dismissing possibilities just because "the cap" is inherently lazy.
When have I dismissed a possibility? I'm talking about things that appear likely. Possible and impossible don't enter into it.
And speaking of inherently lazy, what is lazier than just saying that everything is possible? You have been pounding away at this theme for some time but are too 'lazy' to even come up with reasonably likely hypotheticals.
Including Mason as you suggest reduces the value of the return. So it is paying someone to take him off our hands. He will be gone in 1 year anyway.
Dumping his cap 1 year earlier doesn't enable much for us. For example, we could come up with a scenario whereby getting rid of that 3 mil (after getting a replacement backup) allows us to fit Stastny under the cap. Obviously more than just moving Mason is required but lets assume the rest is in place. That doesn't help with Stastny's salary the year after next because Mason was going to be gone then anyway.