I can understand why Gibson might be concerned, it's not unusual that teams with 1a/1b tandems become attached to the fair rotation of starts rather than playing the best player for the job.What I’ve been hearing is Gibson is 100% down to come to Edmonton but only as a #1. Friedman said, in his opinion, Gibson may just have to bite the bullet and come here as a #1A and eventually earn the #1 role
Boston is a recent example when they screwed themselves over a couple of years ago playing an injured Ullmark in game 6 in what would become an embarrassing 7 game collapse by the Bruins.