Rumor: Rumors & Proposals Thread | Vegas Claims Raph Lavoie off Waivers, Everyone Else Cleared

MoontoScott

Registered User
Jun 2, 2012
8,896
10,940
I'm not happy at all that Lavoie got claimed. One of our few forwards with a shot that can bet goalies clean and good size. He in essence screwed himself last year because of the contract that he signed, but this year I have to think that we botched the situation by making sure that we have the 2 gray beards in the lineup everyday.
The average age of the Oiler forwards is definitely a concern and I think when you have guys who are > or = 35 then the wheels can come off fairly quickly.

Pod is the only forward under 25?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bryanbryoil

La Bamba

Tier 2 Fan
Aug 23, 2009
9,803
6,749
They for sure don’t focus on prospects. But they are always doing whatever to make themselves better.

They will cut whoever if it makes them better. Meanwhile the Oilers don’t want to cut Ryan/Perry because reasons.
Vegas (and especially Tampa) has a good model I wish the Oilers would follow

Just trade all our picks anyways because they just pick busts and draft picks are most valuable when they are draft picks and not busted prospects
 

Bryanbryoil

Pray For Ukraine
Sep 13, 2004
87,288
37,273
The thing is Ryan is useful and did have a good camp.

We keep Lavoie over Perry in the bottom six I’m not sure how much of a net positive it would be.

Lavoie and Perry are both slow. I’m not sure Lavoie would have much opportunity to showcase his shot in the bottom six.
Ryan had like 1 good game a decent 1 and some no shows. Lavoie could learn to crash the net and play a solid 2 way game so that he could eventually transition into a cheap top 6 option.
The average age of the Oiler forwards is definitely a concern and I think when you have guys who are > or = 35 then the wheels can come off fairly quickly.

Pod is the only forward under 25?
Both Perry and Ryan looked cooked last playoffs. Lets hope that it was injuries and that they still have some tread left on their tires.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Duke74

North

Registered User
Jun 25, 2009
15,890
13,707
Ryan had like 1 good game a decent 1 and some no shows. Lavoie could learn to crash the net and play a solid 2 way game so that he could eventually transition into a cheap top 6 option.

Both Perry and Ryan looked cooked last playoffs. Lets hope that it was injuries and that they still have some tread left on their tires.
To be honest the player I want back up is Philp.

He was the most consistently effective of the three of them and is a perfect fit for the bottom six.
 

Mr Positive

Cap Crunch Incoming
Nov 20, 2013
37,647
18,573
It seems like a move purely to get younger, as they are over their roster limit and will have to send down guys.

Honestly I think we should think more like this

Lavoie is 24. Sending him down was practically ending his career. I know he didn't grab a spot but I still feel happy for the kid to get one last shot, even if it's just to be an extra forward and practice with the Knights main lineup
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM

joestevens29

Registered User
Apr 30, 2009
53,902
17,023
Stauffer just said he doesn’t expect the lineup to be the same on opening night as it is right now. And he doesn’t expect the lineup from that night to be the same before the deadline
Stan was on his show at 4ish and said as much. Said the 53 bucks is quite accurate and when pushed about dermot signing he said there will be a 7th guy. Wouldn’t confirm dermot but essentially agreed with bob
 

joestevens29

Registered User
Apr 30, 2009
53,902
17,023
To be honest the player I want back up is Philp.

He was the most consistently effective of the three of them and is a perfect fit for the bottom six.
Stan said he’ll be back but they want him playing 20minutes a night given he’s had a year off. Said philp was biggest positive surprise this training camp as he didn’t know much about him
 
  • Like
Reactions: Oilhawks and North

Jumptheshark

Rebooting myself
Oct 12, 2003
100,584
14,586
Somewhere on Uranus
Looking at the last 10 years of 1st rounders

2024-Sam O'Reilly
2023-traded
2022-Reid Schaefer traded with 2023 for Ekholm
2021-Xavier Bourgault-- traded for nothing on current roster
2020-Dylan Holloway - Offer sheet return 3rd rounder
2019-Philip Broberg - offer sheet 2nd rounder
2018-Evan Bouchard -Still on roster
2017- Kailer Yamamoto- cap dump last off season
2016-Jesse Puljujarvi- now with pens. Was traded for a guy in Europe who we gave the rights up to last off season
2015- McDavid


So for the last 10 1st rounders we have Ekholm Bouchard, and McDavid. 2nd and 3rd.

It is the price you pay for being in win now mode. But the other state I look at it is how many player taken outside of the 1st round have played 10+ games in the NHL with the oilers or assets we received for them,

2015-- Jones, Bear and Marino. We got a pick for Marino who is in uni. Bear was traded for Foegele. Jones for Duncan Keith.
2016-Benson- UFA. Markus Niemelainen--back in Europe. Vinny D now in Vancouver
2017-S. Skinner
2018- McLeod traded for Savoie. Kesselring traded for Cam Dineen and Bjugsted
2019-no one after the first.
2020- No one after the first
2021-no one after the first

I stop at 2021 because after the first it is about development.

At the end of the day are scouting has let us down for picks after the first and we have had a lot of bad asset management in picks we have traded away.

There is a reason why our farm system is depleted. Bad picking and trading away picks for nothing

 

Jimmi McJenkins

Sometimes miracles
Jan 12, 2006
77,994
40,722
Alberta
Understood but I wonder if the medical staff can really forecast this.

Its still good to have some flexibility but I don't expect the Oilers to go out and add a 5M+ d-man even if they could use one.

Once Wright and Savoie are sent down then its about 6.3M cap space?
They'll probably sign Dermott then as well, but yeah, including the LTIR, it would be about $6.4 I would say. I still wonder if they recall Philp.

Looking at the last 10 years of 1st rounders

2024-Sam O'Reilly
2023-traded
2022-Reid Schaefer traded with 2023 for Ekholm
2021-Xavier Bourgault-- traded for nothing on current roster
2020-Dylan Holloway - Offer sheet return 3rd rounder
2019-Philip Broberg - offer sheet 2nd rounder
2018-Evan Bouchard -Still on roster
2017- Kailer Yamamoto- cap dump last off season
2016-Jesse Puljujarvi- now with pens. Was traded for a guy in Europe who we gave the rights up to last off season
2015- McDavid


So for the last 10 1st rounders we have Ekholm Bouchard, and McDavid. 2nd and 3rd.

It is the price you pay for being in win now mode. But the other state I look at it is how many player taken outside of the 1st round have played 10+ games in the NHL with the oilers or assets we received for them,

2015-- Jones, Bear and Marino. We got a pick for Marino who is in uni. Bear was traded for Foegele. Jones for Duncan Keith.
2016-Benson- UFA. Markus Niemelainen--back in Europe. Vinny D now in Vancouver
2017-S. Skinner
2018- McLeod traded for Savoie. Kesselring traded for Cam Dineen and Bjugsted
2019-no one after the first.
2020- No one after the first
2021-no one after the first

I stop at 2021 because after the first it is about development.

At the end of the day are scouting has let us down for picks after the first and we have had a lot of bad asset management in picks we have traded away.

There is a reason why our farm system is depleted. Bad picking and trading away picks for nothing

There's a lot of nothing, but Bouchard trending as elite really helps.
 

MoontoScott

Registered User
Jun 2, 2012
8,896
10,940
Ryan had like 1 good game a decent 1 and some no shows. Lavoie could learn to crash the net and play a solid 2 way game so that he could eventually transition into a cheap top 6 option.

Both Perry and Ryan looked cooked last playoffs. Lets hope that it was injuries and that they still have some tread left on their tires.
And like old tires the continued wear and tear just makes the ride a little bumpier.

I don't think either of these guys can be serious contributors night after night especially if the Oilers make the playoffs and go on a deep run (hopefully?).

Well, its definitely "win now" time so we'll see what happens.
 

ujju2

Registered User
Apr 9, 2016
9,745
6,665
Edmonton, AB
He may have outplayed them offensively 5x5 but that’s not only what those players are here for.

The Oilers are not a middle tier team anymore trying to squeeze as many regular season goals as possible from the roster, there are postseason roles that have importance and if a young player is going to supplant a veteran, he needs to show he can handle those roles, Lavoie didn’t in a short cup of coffee in the bigs, 4 years in the AHL and a couple of training camps.

As much as of some of our fans want speed and 4 scoring lines that is not how this veteran team one win away from a cup is built.
I understand the leadership aspect, but otherwise what has Perry provided that Lavoie has shown to be incapable of? If anything, having a more offensive player like Lavoie who can move up to your third line allows you to move a guy like Janmark down a line and really play more of a specialist role.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mr Positive

5 Mins 4 Ftg

Life is better with no expectations.
Sponsor
Apr 3, 2016
51,349
88,706
Edmonton
Asses what the hell are asses

843408F9-CBAD-45BA-9DC8-41C7C582B5F6.gif
 
  • Like
Reactions: VainGretzky

McAsuno

Registered User
Jul 10, 2013
27,273
37,160
Edmonton
I’m guessing that they weren’t happy with the players either.

Ehhh, maybe? Who knows. The players know at the end of the day, business is still involved. I wouldn't have paid Broberg for what he got, but I'm still bummed Holloway went for the $$$. Boobirds will go their way anyways when both teams play here. Hope the money was worth over chasing a cup, but that's none of my business lol.
 

tiger_80

Registered User
Apr 11, 2007
10,248
3,545
The average age of the Oiler forwards is definitely a concern and I think when you have guys who are > or = 35 then the wheels can come off fairly quickly.

Pod is the only forward under 25?
Yes, but Raphael Lavoie won't make a difference in this regard. Maybe Holloway would. They need young legs higher in the depth chart. Does not much matter whether you have Lavoie or Perry mostly warming the bench. Most top 6 guys are still in their prime.
 

Jarvi

Registered User
Mar 22, 2012
513
302
Yeah, paying Holloway and Broberg almost 7m would've been way better.
Didn't reports come out that we could have signed both for like, under 4? Had we prioritized them over Perry and Skinner, odds are it wouldn't have been at the price tag that St Louis got them at.

Though I am cautiously optimistic on Skinner, he is a gamble and 3m is a big hit if he doesn't look miles better than he did in preseason. But I'm holding out hope.
 

CycloneSweep

Registered User
Sep 27, 2017
50,601
42,315
Yeah, paying Holloway and Broberg almost 7m would've been way better.
That’s the rough part though.
The org has Broberg as a player that they refused to even consider in trades. He was an untouchable etc etc. and then he is gone for a 2nd. Also rumours of Holloway being untouchable.
At the end of the day the org mismanaged 2 important assets, I agree that we absolutely couldn’t give them those caps, but it doesn’t make up for the fact that we mismanaged them as assets from the start.
The org has been awful with its first round picks since…well mostly since McDavid. Bouchard is good but everything else has been bad. Our best first round picks are the ones we used to get Ekholm.

At the end of the day the org is extremely old and has maybe 2-3 prospects with NHL potential in the entire system. So many prospects and picks lost for nothing. It’s unfortunate.
 

Ad

Ad

Ad