Imo the focus up front should be size in the top 6 and having guys that can win in the dirty areas to open up ice for McDavid and RNH, while the bottom 6 is built around speed and 2 way play, with a healthy pinch of skill.
Personally I don't get the rationale behind trading Kane:
- Is he as good as he was? No.
- Is he still an effective top 6 talent, who brings a unicorn skillset? Yes.
- Do you think you can find better value out there at 5mil? I don't.
- Would I bet on a UFA-to-be Kane being super motivated to have a big year? Hell yes.
I'd just staple Kane to McDavid at evens for the year, and wish him well at the end of the year as he chases the biggest bag he can get.
I also think the bottom 6 should be fairly close to being set. Podz worked well with both Kapanen and Arvidsson on his opposite wing, and I think that's a natural spot for Savoie. Plunk Uncle Rico between the 2 kids and I can see that as the basis for a nice 3rd line.
As for the 4th line: Just move Janmark back to wing, give Philp a proper look at C, and sign a RW that can skate like the wing, PK, and play somewhat physical; all on a cheap deal. (in other words, just re-sign Kapanen). Finally sign a decent C/W option at the 13th forward, who skate, PK, and also not get completely embarrassed in the faceoff dot (Lazar being my favourite fit).
Frederic-McDavid-Kane
RNH-Draisaitl-Hyman
Podkolzin-Henrique-Savoie
Janmark-Philp-
Kapanen
Lazar
- I have Frederic starting on the top line, but he's an easy guy to shift around the lineup depending on who's hot and not. You could swap him with anyone on the 3rd line, and still have both lines make sense.
- Most key roles have several players that can fill them (biggest being Rico is not you're only 3C option, and Hyman has some non-geriatric backup in the PF role).
- Also for the first time in a while you'd get some actual mileage out of several value contracts.