FlameChampion
Registered User
- Jul 13, 2011
- 14,162
- 20,667
OK I don't understand, I guess I never will. But how one Earth do so many people want Connor Brown retained? He's as bad as Janmark at this point. What are people really basing it on? Brown in playoffs despite getting intervals on top line had miserable production in last 3 rounds. he was good against Kings, thats it. He had only 2 TKA and 17GVA in playoffs. He was poor on pk, he had 3 goals against goalies. He has among the lowest hits/minute of any forward. In almost every stat he's in Janmark territory.
So why the vast disparity. What are people actually seeing in Connor Brown. All of Kapanen, Podkolzin, Perry, even Henrique better options than him.
I don't want to extend Henrique but very clearly a bias operates against him. He hits way more than Brown, 3X as much, he hits hard, He beat goalies 3X in playoffs, He has less GA, Better shot, more skilled player.
Brown had only 3hits/60mins in the playoffs. A disgusting total for somebody that is supposed to be a role player and really brings no other facet. Connor Brown had 1 hit/60mins in regular season. he had one more goal than Henrique all season, an ENG. Of the two Brown gets more minutes high up the lineup and does nothing with it.
Oh well, looks like people get their wish and we have years more of overpaid Brown doing next to nothing with zero intangibles. I would never have had this guy.
I don’t mind him if its cheap and short term. I don’t really want both him and Janmark on the team though. One or the other (or neither).